Her giving Joe Q Public the wank while it bends over for Wall Street. Other 400k speeches include eye contact and high fiving. It's pretty much the optics and her chameleon-like pandering nature that doesn't bring any semblance or remoteness of confidence to end corruption, such as actions to overturn citizens united through legislative mandate on the pulpit and SCOTUS appointments. That doesn't really matter. She could earn 1 dollar like a CEO, but unlike a CEO, her expenses under a non-profit are less documented and line itemed. The AP ran an expose on the Red Cross with their efforts in Haiti. Not something to brighten your day when concerning non-profits and charities.
Recent Events from that AP story.... tl;dr Clinton campaign sandbags by asking AP to "prove it" by releasing sources. AP refuses. Clinton campaign then cherry picks with their "own analysis" through counter-tweets. Enough examples reasonable visitors (less than 10) so that her own partisans can scratch their asses, pick their noses, then point fingers at Trump being more corrupt and shady. Obviously if Clintons were transparent to begin with, or say...honor her agreements with the President of the United States to maintain clear delineations between State and the Clinton Foundation, the AP wouldn't have to pull teeth with the State Dept. to fully release the list of private, non-official visitors the Clintons met in her capacity as Secretary of State. Asking the AP to reveal their sources poses classical First Amendment tensions between the state and the press. Just because the public has faith in neither doesn't mean we can individually cherry pick from our own arbitrary standards. Link for the interested: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...story-on-clinton-foundation-donors-all-wrong/
Just want to add this here so we can keep track of this very important investigation. Article is from January 2018 on alleged crimes posted in 2016. No delay cupcake. Lock her up!
Lets not forget your ignorance. Just 10 minutes ago, you didn't even know of the investigations. But that didn't stop you from spouting off like the ignoramus you are. Congrats. Meanwhile, The house subcommittee investigation started 9 months ago. SO LONG AGO RIGHT?
Is that the Benghazi one or the uranium one or the pizza parlor one? Please update your thread so I can keep up. Thanks. I admittedly don't regularly search the internet for Clinton investigation news. I'm going to leave that in your capable conspiracy theory hands.
Classic quote. I guess you support impeachment then? Or is that just a politically motivated deep state witch hunt?
You really are obsessed with my custom titles. Let's see what else I can come up with that will trigger you.
It's an intentional misspelling, something I picked up on the Twitter and often post here.. Good job, good effort.
LOL More conspiracy theories. You need to get a life or at the very least a sense of humor. http://bbs.clutchfans.net/index.php...ywhere&o=relevance&c[node]=28&c[user][0]=1451 I'm out. Good luck with your investigations. Update me with any indictments.
