1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Chron] Rockets Camp Report: Ron gets physical with Chuck, gives everyone a gold star

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Carl Herrera, Oct 3, 2008.

  1. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,613
    Likes Received:
    12,003
    With Scola, a healthy/athletic Landry and the concept of playing Ron Ron at PF, Chuck's prospects for floor time are very limited. I like having him on the team because he's a good practice player and brings a useful skill to the table: Defense. But he won't be playing very often.

    BTW, thanks for letting me back in the GARM.
     
  2. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,748
    Likes Received:
    12,484
    Chuck weakness are both perception and real on the offensive end. Chuck does miss a good share of his open layups but he also gets himself in position for those layups better than most people which is why his shooting percentage is so high. I don't really have any problems with that other than an a occasionally curse word during a game.

    The real liability for Chuck is that he has no jumpshot or post moves so other teams can totally sag off of him in pick and roll situation. The only thing stopping Hayes from being a full time starter in this league is a respectable jumpshot. He develops a jumpshot like Brand or Boozer, he would be a full MLE type guy.
     
  3. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    I agree 100%.
     
  4. joesr

    joesr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,772
    Likes Received:
    115

    I don't see this happening even close. Shane and Artest will be splitting minutes at the 3 (that's already 24 minutes) and the rest will probably be from giving T some time off (Barry will only play a couple minutes per game till PO).

    also chuck has proven to play good def on bench centers as well
     
  5. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Once Battier gets back in the full swing of things, I expect Adelman will use him and Artest together at the forward spots for significant stretches. Also, Chuck's biggest strength -- his ability to switch defensively from post up players to perimeter players -- is well covered by Artest. As much as I hate to say it I don't see Chuck getting many minutes this year, barring injury.
     
  6. Angkor Wat

    Angkor Wat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,150
    Likes Received:
    997
    Here are some interesting news on T-Mac and Francis from that same article:

     
  7. Texas Stoke

    Texas Stoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    5,743
    Likes Received:
    18
    I'm glad to hear of this postive relationship forming between Artest and Hayes, even if it just keeps opponents from laughing at Chuck Hayes freethrow shot, it's a plus.
     
  8. BleedsRocketRed

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    3,910
    Likes Received:
    2,197
    This so true. A lot of people dont understand, or just dont realize what skills he brings to this team. He is an important situational player.
     
  9. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,613
    Likes Received:
    12,003
    So you think when Shane and Ron Ron are on the floor together it will be mostly as PF/SF instead of SF/SG? I'm not so sure about that. Perhaps they will be paired most often when Tracy is resting and one slides to SG. If it turns out Ron Ron can defend and rebound against taller PFs for "significant stretches" as you say, the Rockets will be very tough to defend. Most PFs have little chance of stopping him.
     
  10. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    The Rockets gain nothing from playing Artest and Battier together at the forward spots. The entire point of going small is to put more offensive weapons on the floor, because in theory, most smaller perimeter players are more potent than lumbering traditional big guys. It doesn't work in our case. Both Scola and Landry are light years superior to Battier offensively, so the notion is counterintuitive.
     
  11. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    In the 4th quarter of a close game, I think Adelman is going to often value Battier's superior team defense and 3-point shooting over what Scola and Landry bring. If we take Yao, McGrady, and Artest as a given in the 4th quarter, then I think we'll see quite a bit of Battier in there as well. Of course it may not be technically correct to say that Battier and Artest are the "forwards" while T-Mac is the guard. I guess defensive matchups would dictate that.
     
  12. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575

    Actually, the point of going small in the Rockets case would be to put more 3-point shooting on the floor so the lane is open for either a post-up or a penetration. Particularly, taking the opposing PF, ususally the second biggest guy on the opposing team, out of the lane makes life particularly difficult.

    The Rockets played Battier at the 4 for some stretches last year and, as far as I remember, it works fine offensively. Either the lane was open or our perimeter guys (particularly Battier in the corner) gets left open for 3s. A line up with one big (Yao/Scola/Landry/Chuck/Deke(?), Battier/Artest at the 3 and 4, and some combo of McGrady/Alston/Brooks/Barry/Head at the guard positions should provide plenty of spacing. Not all of these guys are dead-eye shooters, but they each shoot well enough for the opposing team to have to respect the shot.

    In the past, the problem with this strategy came on the other end since having an extra 3point shooter typically meant we go with Luther filling Battier's spot on the wing. Not only do you replace one good big perimeter defender with a relatively small one, you also take Battier out of his biggest strength by making him defending the post. Overall, you end up being undersized at the 2 and the 4 once you go small.

    With Artest, this is much less of a problem because you still have one of them available to guard the best opposing wing, and Artest should do a better job than Battier as a post-defender. You really are not undersized anywhere defensively. Yao would still be bigger than anyone in the league. Artest is not tall, but at 250 lbs he probably weighs as much as any PF. Battier and Tracey are big wings. Rafer is big enough at the 1 for the most part. And there is still Barry available to back up the 2 when playing Luther there is a problem.


    It is true that Landry and Scola are overall better offensive players than Battier. However, neither are 3 point shooters (though Landry is rumored to have worked on it). Playing an Artest/Battier lineup gives you the spacing you wouldn't get with Landry or Scola at the 4.
     
  13. Texas Stoke

    Texas Stoke Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    5,743
    Likes Received:
    18
    Not at the SM position. Artest would be guarding powerforwards dude. Ahha, but you forgot about that though, huh?
     
  14. daoshi

    daoshi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    75
    Don't forget there will be some minutes to share for those guys at 5, since they plan to keep Yao's minutes down.
     
  15. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    Chuck Hayes is a better player than either Outlaw or Evans.......period. It's not even close. And for anyone to suggest that Evans is a smarter player than Hayes, that's plain ludicrous.
     
  16. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,909
    Likes Received:
    372
    thanks!

    No problem on the seeding. As long as they are on my computer I am more than willing to open them up.
     
  17. Alvin Choo

    Alvin Choo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,466
    Likes Received:
    152
    yeap, for his "ability" at the free trow line, i keep him at the team for years to come.

    If he develops a jumpshot like brand, he be much more than a full MLE, he be brand lite. Thats like 8-9m of talent there.



    On his ability to guard quicker players, i remember last season where he cant defend west. On his ability to defend, his like top 10 pf in the league, but his offense is like last 10 on the entire roster. If only he can add some 4-5 inch to his vertical, where he can dunk instead of laying up. I be so happy for him.
     
  18. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,613
    Likes Received:
    12,003
    Cutting Yao's playing time by 3-4 mins/game won't help Chuck very much. More likely Landry will get extra minutes as Scola slides over to C.
     
  19. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,811
    Likes Received:
    786
    I think Hayes over came the odds to make it, but many or some put his value to a team higher than it should like Battier. Hayes is a situational sub and if the rox thought as highly about him as on this board, they wouldn't have been drafting and trading for his position over the last 2 yrs. For those that said Outlaw wasn't a really good defender, ask Francis or any other guard whom Outlaw has run a 1 man press after a made bucket. Evans is just as poor offensive player, but he's basically a 10 reb guy.
     
  20. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,748
    Likes Received:
    12,484
    Nah. He still wouldn't be able to put the ball on the floor and wouldn't demand a double team ever. Opposing teams just wouldn't dare him to shoot anymore. He would be a full MLE player.
     

Share This Page