1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Chron] Harris looks for second chance with Rockets

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Hayesfan, Jul 13, 2008.

  1. glimmertwins

    glimmertwins Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,873
    Likes Received:
    5,559
    There is a long history of tall players who can't board either. Obviously it doesn't hurt, but if you have ever watched Jason Collins play you would understand that is just a tired saying. I mean Dennis Rodman was one of the greatest rebounders ever and he wasn't especially tall - and he did that in the heyday of 7ft+ guys like Olajuwon, Ewing, Smits, old Kareem, etc.

    I agree that rebounding is an important in the playoffs, but I don't think height plays any more of a role in being a rebounder or rebounding team than instinct, boxing out(guys with lower center of gravity tend to be better at clearing a guy out), quickness(for getting in position for boards), and quick hops(for boarding above the rim).

    Plus in Okur's case in the playoffs this year, the disparity isn't quite as bad as you mentioned because he played 5-6 more minute in the Rockets series than he did on the regular season so his playoff to regular season stats can't be compared one to one. Basically he averaged about 3 boards more in the Rockets series. Thats significant, but I wouldn't chalk that up on his size alone. Besides, if you want to use the size argument, Boozer is shorter than him and is a far better rebounder. I'm just saying...

    ..talking about Harris though, I think it's obvious he is a bottom of the roster/depth kind of guy. He doesn't need to have the height or speed to guard all star players but he has to be productive in the minutes they would give him - mostly in the 2nd team setting playing the starter's backups. If he can produce in that setting where the talent isn't quite as good, than he is of value and could make the roster. I like him for his heart but I have to admit I'm skeptical if he makes the roster with the comp he has.
     
  2. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,412
    Likes Received:
    3,294
    I think Harris has proven to be a more effective player than all of those guys...including Novak. Unfortunately, Woods might get a roster spot because of Yao's injury history and Deke's retirement. Francis might stay to be part of a salary dump trade. Head is actually needed with our shaky guard play so....

    who knows...i think Harris outplayed some of our players in preseason last year but i think the line of thinking to let him go is that he won't play that much while everyone is healthy and therefore won't have a big enough affect on the game to justify waiving guaranteed contracts. I wish we could get some deals done before the season starts but i fear that main rotation players and bigger expiring contracts will be given priority which really does put Harris and Novak in the fringe player category.
     
  3. The_Nine_Gates

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    At the moment

    PG Alston/Jackson/Brooks
    SG McGrady/Barry/Francis
    SF Battier/Green/Novak
    PF Scola/Landry/Hayes
    C Yao/Dorsey/?

    Even if Mutumbo and Head are both gone I see no place for Harris. Novak's ability to knock a 3 down at the end of a game is more valuable IMHO than yet another undersized hustle guy being on the team. I don't think it matters what happens with guys like Head, Francis, Mutombo because even if one of Head or Francis is gone the other will probably be their at SG.

    Then even if Mutombo is gone the Rockets would still probably then keep Woods or get another center. At SF/PF where Harris would be playing I don't see where he gets the roster spot. Of course Green could be a total bust this summer and get cut so you never know.
     
  4. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    The need in a backup 5 especially if Deke is not back. Even if Deke is back for one more season, the Rockets will still look for a backup 5 to replace Deke when he's retired. Woods has a minimum contract. In consideration Diop can get 30 millions and other 7 footers get pay 2/3 millions for playing 7-8 minutes, Woods is a good deal with a good bang for the buck. I really think the Rockets have a good chance of keeping him if there is open roster spot.
     
  5. Laozi

    Laozi Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    1

    Yeah, once every two years Novak makes his presence felt. Totally worth keeping
     
  6. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    First, do you expect teams to sit their starters in playoffs like they do in regular season?

    Okur got almost more than 50% rebounds than his regular season. If that's not a big disparity, I dont know what that is.

    The fact is Okur abused all the midgets in the Rockets front court on the board. In Gm 4, I guess Okur snatched the rebound over Landry's head from the 2nd missed FT at the end of game is not enough to break your heart.

    Harris can only be your 13th/14th man in your roster - an insurance good to have but nobody really cares about. If you cant see that, I really dont know what to say.
     
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,357
    Likes Received:
    39,912
    WE DID NOT HAVE YAO MING AGAINST UTAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    DD
     
  8. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    Let me put it this way and please dont jump on me and crucify me.

    If both teams were healthy and I had to bet which team to win the series in last season, I would still give Jazz the edge but it would be a close 7 game series. Jazz had a better point differential than the Rockets and a better bench.

    In that series, the Rockets didnt have Yao and suffered from many injuries. But both D Will and Boozer were floored hard in different games at the end of March. D Will still could perform. Boozer was obviously not himself and very different from the way he went off in March. Otherwise, I really think the Jazz could beat the Lakers.
     
  9. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,357
    Likes Received:
    39,912
    I vehemetly disagree with you, as I think the Rockets were much better this year with Scolandry than they were last year......

    And would have won because of that....

    But.....it is all a matter of opinion.

    DD
     
  10. jump shooter

    jump shooter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    5,429
    Likes Received:
    145
    Forget Yao in the Jazz series, if Rafer was healthy the rockets win that series. Bobby Jackson looked lost as a starter (while running out of gas) and the teams chemistry was completely thrown off with the make shift lineup.
     
  11. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    377
    Show me how the Jazz improved from 2006-07 to 2007-08...

    Now think about how the Rockets improved from 2006-07 to 2007-08.

    We almost beat them in 06-07.. in fact were but one rebound away from doing so.

    You don't think completely healthy we could have rocked Utah's world?

    Edit:
    Exactly! You said it much more simply than I did.
     
  12. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    If Boozer was healthy, it would be a sweep.

    Point differential is the best indicator of a team.
     
  13. jump shooter

    jump shooter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    5,429
    Likes Received:
    145
    Opinions vary. Boozer looked pretty good to me physically (Deke checked him pretty good), I think he was alot more healthy than Rafer's hamstring (who actually missed games) Battier's (knee), T-Mac's knee and Landry's knee.
     
  14. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    377
    Our point differential in the second half of the season was just as good as the Jazz (please don't make me go find the stats... lol) Overall during the year they were higher than us, but the second half of the year we were comparable.
     
  15. kwng

    kwng Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like Mike toughness and hustle. He has not been given sufficient PT to prove himself. His play position and height is also not helping him. We have to cut someone to put him in our roster. Here's our team and those I think will be fighting for a roster spot

    1. 12 Rafer Alston G 6-2 175 07/24/1976 (in roster unless traded)
    2. 31 Shane Battier F 6-8 220 09/09/1978 (in roster unless traded)
    3. 0 Aaron Brooks G 6-0 161 01/14/1985 (in roster unless traded)
    4. 15 Joey Dorsey F 6-8 268 12/16/1983 (in roster unless traded)
    5. 3 Steve Francis G 6-3 210 02/21/1977 (in roster unless traded)
    6. 5 Donte Greene F 6-9 222 02/21/1988 (in roster unless traded)
    7. 19 Mike Harris F 6-6 240 06/15/1983 (maybe traded) *
    8. 44 Chuck Hayes F 6-6 238 06/11/1983 (maybe traded) *
    9. 2 Luther Head G 6-3 185 11/26/1982 (maybe traded) *
    10. 8 Bobby Jackson G 6-1 185 03/13/1973 (should be traded) **
    11. 14 Carl Landry (FA) F 6-9 248 09/19/1983 (in roster unless traded)
    12. 10 Maarty Leunen ** F 6-9 220 09/03/1985 (may not be signed) **
    13. 1 Tracy McGrady G 6-8 223 05/24/1979 (in roster)
    14. 55 Dikembe Mutombo C 7-2 260 06/25/1966 (maybe retired or others) *
    15. 20 Steve Novak F 6-10 220 06/13/1983 (maybe traded) *
    16. 4 Luis Scola F-C 6-9 245 04/30/1980 (in roster unless traded)
    17. 33 Loren Woods C 7-2 260 06/21/1978 (maybe traded or release) *
    18. 11 Yao Ming C 7-6 310 09/12/1980 (in roster)
    19. Brent Barry G 6-7 210 12/31/1971 (in roster)

    I presumed those with * still have a chance. Those with ** most likely to be out of the roster. We have 19 players, we may not need Loren if we think Scola or Dorsey can be a backup C along with Deke.

    In short, we can cut our roster to 17 players with ease and we need to cut another two (hopefully via trade). So which two?

    Mike Harris
    Chuck Hayes
    Luther Head
    Dikembe Mutombo
    Loren Woods
    Steve Novak
     
  16. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Why are you naked in the shower with your p***y cat? :eek:

    Now all this beefy references make sense.
     
  17. The_Yoyo

    The_Yoyo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    16,683
    Likes Received:
    2,873
    i love harris and would want him on the team next year as well can never have enough all out hustle hard workers but yeah right now:

    tmac
    barry
    alston
    yao
    shane
    luis
    jackson
    francis
    hayes
    novak
    greene
    dorsey
    head
    brooks

    are guaranteed for next season



    then we have:
    deke
    landry
    harris
    woods

    chances are woods is gone, and if deke and landry sign that means harris is gone too. and then on top of that we need to also get rid of a player. more than likely morey may make a minor 2 for 1 deal that includes head and hayes imo. i dont want to lose hayes just yet personally.

    He could let luther go for a draft pick though to make room for deke and landry. (assuming Deke will resign with us)

    unfortunately its another "numbers game" like last season and Harris maybe odd one out again
     
  18. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,357
    Likes Received:
    39,912

    And that would be stupid, if Harris outperforms or can help your club more than a higher priced guaranteed contract, you keep him.....

    Mike Harris is a power wing player, someone different than Barry, and able to give different looks off the bench to cause matchup problems.

    I would keep Harris over Head......while Luther can shoot, IMHO, Harris has more to offer to the team overall.

    DD
     
  19. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,795
    Likes Received:
    41,234
    No argument about the need for a tall backup for Yao if Deke doesn't return, but I've seen nothing from Woods to make me think he fills the potential need. Yao's health concerns makes it even more important. The staff must have seen more from the guy than I did.
     
  20. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    377

    Agreed. I think that it's possible that your boy Steve is also one that is possibly going to move (I know... sacrilege!) Steve and Chuck are the two that are most expendable with value.

    Luther has some value as well, but will have to be part of a package I think.

    It all is going to depend on what happens as far as trades - so yeah it may be a numbers game (which is frustrating) but I am really glad to see that Mike is working hard at making it as difficult as he can for them to let him go.
     

Share This Page