1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Christopher Nolan's New Film: INTERSTELLAR

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Keyser Soze, Jan 9, 2013.

  1. cheke64

    cheke64 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,812
    Likes Received:
    17,782
    I like movies like these. Quest to explore and set new boundaries. I can relate to the actor.
     
  2. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    Who shat upon your mueslix this morning?
     
  3. ketchupNmustard

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    35
  4. dmc89

    dmc89 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    255
    A friend saw this at the world premiere. I respect his taste in his movies so it worried me when he said the movie was a bit disappointing given the hype and long wait. Said although visually amazing, the plot was somewhat mediocre. It reminded him of Prometheus (2012) which many hated for its 2nd half of the story.
     
  5. 713

    713 Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,821
    Likes Received:
    926
    Sitting at 69% on RT atm. Though only 26 reviews.
     
  6. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,101
    Likes Received:
    32,806
    Kind of reminds me of Gravity
    I think it should be better than that but . .. . . one never knows

    Rocket River
     
  7. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,747
    It does make me a little bit nervous that they are using a heavy lift chemical rocket to get to an interstellar spacecraft with the power to make blackholes.
     
  8. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,105
    Likes Received:
    3,756
    When I first watched it I assumed they were using some refurbed Saturn V rocket because of a global emergency (and the scavanging of parts from a drone). But then I saw the really advanced tech later in the trailer and wondered why that would be the case.
     
  9. Surfguy

    Surfguy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    24,524
    Likes Received:
    12,787
    Not as good as "Mission to Mars". ;)
     
  10. J Sizzle

    J Sizzle Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    43,847
    Likes Received:
    30,172
    It kind of seemed like it lacked substance despite a lot of style in the trailers, to me at least.
     
  11. Duncan McDonuts

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    10,381
    Likes Received:
    4,179
    I never really understood the hype for this movie other than Nolan directing.
     
  12. 713

    713 Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,821
    Likes Received:
    926
    The cast is ridiculous. You would expect more from all the A-listers and Nolan directing. I was really looking forward to watching this. Kinda bum about all the negative reviews so far.
     
  13. Bob Barker 007

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,287
    I only look at the Top Critics. So let's look at them:

    8.8/10
    80%
    4 Fresh 1 Rotten

    Seems pretty good to me.
     
  14. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841
    It's got a great cast. Looks to be visually spectacular. It's a sci-fi, which is hardly a well-tread genre these days. And yes it's Nolan.

    If it's similar to Gravity, in that the story doesn't hold to the same level as the rest of the production, I'm fine with that.

    And then the dynamic between him and his daughter, and the line "I'll love you forever." As a father that get's me every time.



    Maybe we've been spoiled by his other movies and the high reviews they've received. Cause 70% if that holds, is still damn good.
     
  15. GRENDEL

    GRENDEL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    17,464
    Likes Received:
    5,261
    Also, it's not a reboot, franchise starter or superhero movie which is really rare nowadays from big studio productions...
     
  16. Deji McGever

    Deji McGever יליד טקסני

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 1999
    Messages:
    4,013
    Likes Received:
    952
    Nolan has a thing for film stock, and has single-handedly kept Imax film (as in non-digital) alive. At least, that's what an art house projectionist claimed when I was having this conversation two days ago.

    I don't know how far technology has improved, but I'm guessing old-fashioned silver halide film still has an advantage in contrast ratio. But the real answer I'd be safe with is, Nolan shot it on film and prefers it projected old school, and that's how his films were intended to be viewed (including the Dark Knight trilogy).
     
  17. i3artow i3aller

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    20,163
    Likes Received:
    37,882
    Guardian - Jonah Nolan (Christopher’s brother) had originally been hired by Steven Spielberg and the producer Linda Obst, in 2007, to turn Kip Thorne’s theories about black holes and wormholes into a movie for Paramount. Eventually Spielberg moved on to other projects, but one evening in 2009, while scouting locations for the final film in the Batman trilogy,The Dark Knight Rises, Jonah told his brother about the script he was working on. Nolan had his own ideas for a movie about interplanetary travel, which he merged with the first and final acts of Jonah’s script. He also brought along Warner Bros, even though the project had been initiated by Paramount. “He doesn’t have a deal with Warner Bros, and it wasn’t like he was obliged to make sure they were a part of it,” Brad Grey said. When he met Nolan to hear the pitch for the script, the director said that he wanted Warner Bros to be a part of the deal, as an acknowledgment of the support they had given Nolan after a lone gunman walked into a packed theatre showing The Dark Knight Rises in 2012, killing 12 audience members and injuring 70 others. The studio had closed ranks around the film-maker, pulling him from a European press tour, withholding grosses, and donating money to a charity benefiting the victims. “He felt a real sense of loyalty because of what they had just been through,” Grey said. “When he explained it to me I said yes on the spot.”

    The deal that Paramount and Warner Bros negotiated was anomalous to say the least. For the right to distribute Interstellar internationally, Warner Bros traded the rights for two of their franchises, Friday the 13th and South Park, plus “a to-be-determined A-list Warners property”, while its subsidiary, Legendary, agreed to trade Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice for a further piece of the pie. To say this disregards the reigning economic logic of modern Hollywood is not quite right – it reverses the normal logic by which Hollywood operates. Franchises are the lifeblood of the studios. For Warner Bros to hand over the rights to two of its well-known properties, representing money in the bank, for the opportunity to take a spin on an original idea – a film with no sequel potential and few merchandising opportunities, based on the dimly understood recesses of quantum physics – speaks both to the value placed by the studios on Nolan, and also the extent to which he has become a franchise unto himself.

    Some cool behind the scenes **** from the Hollywood movie industry that I didnt even know could go on. Studios trading movie franchises like they’re goddam baseball cards. Pulling the trigger on a 2 movies and a property to be named later for McConaughey and Nolan like its some sort of fantasy movie league. I gotta be honest, I feel like Warner Bros. straight up fleeced Paramount in this deal. I mean this isn’t the 1980s…how much money are you really making on Friday the 14th almost 35 years after it first came out? I know you can always churn out a Jason Voorhees flick and make a little dough but its not like you’re getting a big time money maker. South Park I’m sure has potential for at least another big movie but its not like they are churning those out left and right either. That A-List property to be named later is a mother****er though. I wonder if Paramount can just choose which one they want. Wait for the next Harry Potter to come along and be like “Yea we’ll take that one.” If Warner Bros is smart they put some protection on that future pick. But overall I feel like nabbing Nolan and McConaughey in the most highly anticipated sci fi movie since like Avatar is a steal. This movie is gonna make a billion dollars. You can have Voorhees and Cartman, I’ll take the billion dollars now.
     
  18. Cranberry_Juice

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    208
    IF this was Rick Smith, he would have traded back the A lister for 2 B listers.
     
  19. percicles

    percicles Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,987
    Likes Received:
    4,437
    Ryan Gosling for Tom Hiddleton & Eddie Redmayne?
     
  20. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    That kinda sorta somewhat makes me want to go buy a LINCOLN and some RELIANT ENERGY electricity. :eek:
     

Share This Page