She is a good looking chick and has a nice face, but she would look better if she lost about 20-30 lbs. That extra weight on her hips isn't healthy, and it will be more pronounced in a few years.
lol this reminds me of the system me and some friends used to gy by ages ago haha thinking back this is so hilarious, but funny ehough to me to mention.. 1) The arch: Here, we are talking about the arch when you view a girl from the side (rather than in front of her or behind her). It's the arch from the upper or middle of the back till.... well, you get the idea. We somehow came to the conclusion that the concavity of the arch was essential to female "hotness" and that it's implications weren't merely physical. It implied that the girl had certain personality characteristics, and makes the neck and calves more attractive. Heels exaggerate the arch depending on how big the heels are. A girl with zero or near-zero concavity we would generally have zero interest in physically. 2) The system: Upstairs:midsection:downstairs, each on a scale of 1 to 10. For example, Sandra Bullock would be a 2:2:3 and Christina hendricks would be an 8:5:7 or something like that. This allows for saving time in a conversation among friends - "Dude, she was hot, like a 5:2:6." other dude: "I'm more of a 7:4:7 kinda guy". hahaha brings back memories. Save the "cool story bro". (how many of you go to the end of the post just WAITING to say it? lol)
Jesus Fing Christ. I know the world is falling to hell, but internet nerds calling this chick "fat" only makes this inevitability all the more near. Holy crap ya'll need help. Kate Moss ain't hot. Chicks are supposed to be curvy, not a goddam stick.
she is hot, a little too pasty white for my tastes, but would still hit... Voluptuous/Curvy = hot...she is not fat at all...
Stop your "agree with", "disagree with", "pale this", "too fat that", "not tall enough" or "she isn't a perfect 10" CRAP and post pictures, gentlemen. A picture is worth A THOUSAND WORDS:
FYI, she's not a real readhead. She's blonde and dyes it. RocketsPimp = dreamcrusher Ditto. And there is no way she is 140. More like 160 at least, if not 170. She's a size 10.
actually, this picture speaks 1 BIG word: BEER BELLY. I love big cans, but I'm not a flabby stomach kind of guy. I love a little extra weight distributed nicely in strategic areas (see: Kardashian, Kim), but there's a trade off between big cans and big gut, and this girl is just over the threshold in the gut category. ******* that thing is bulging out. Here's an example of excessive real boobage with a nice frame/flat stomach, unlike our extra large girl of this thread: Spoiler NOTICE the flat, non-bulging stomach.
:grin: BEER BELLY is 2 words, sir. Well, then... Here's more Christina for those of us who would like to admire a "PASTY", "dyed", "belly bulgy", "not tall enough", "not like Pr0nstar Fake-Boobed Kardashian", or "too fat" woman: Enjoy, gentlemen (and some ladies, too): <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPjGaRc7r8E&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PPjGaRc7r8E&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Bad photo. She looks like a butterface in that one. The "Felicity, season 2"-awful hairstyle doesn't help.
Even THEN, notice where the guy behind Tina Fey is looking. I didn't post it because she looked the hottest in there. I posted it because it shows the dude doing that.
You just don't get it. She's playing a character that was considered to have the ideal figure in the 1950's/early '60's (and as far back as the late '40's). So for the role, she's perfect. Ever seen Some Like it Hot? A classic comedy directed by the great Billy Wilder, with Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis, and Jack Lemmon. Marilyn has the same figure, although her rack, while magnificent, pales next to that of Ms. Hendricks. Ms. Monroe, by the way, was not a natural blonde. Despite the same curvaceous figure, and dyed hair, she was considered the sexiest actress of her day, a legend still. I understand people having personal tastes. I always leaned towards blondes and redheads, having dated and lived with both when I was single, my significant other is a natural blonde, and I prefer chicks more on the slender side (although they can become voluptuous over the years and after a couple of kids!), but was always open to hotness on both the skinny side and the voluptuous women like we're discussing here. Broad minded, you might say. Ms. Hendricks was exactly who would bowl over the guys in the era of Mad Men. Perfect casting, and a damn good actress. What's not to like?
