1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Chris Kaman?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by onreego, May 2, 2012.

Tags:
  1. carib

    carib Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    141
    I don't really think its the centers lack of ability to score in the posts was the problem it was more that they are defensive specialists and not scorers. PPAt was in their and his low post game needs a lot of work, but he can hit the mid range jump shot. I have seen teams do well with one low post scorer, not that thats desirable. When you have one low post scorer you need good passing and good off the ball movement. Often times the Rockets tried to post Scola in the fourth quarter and he was trapped and struggled to pass and the rest of the team did not do well moving off the ball. This is something the Rockets must work on in the offseason regardless of whether we have one or two post up players.
     
  2. LCAhmed

    LCAhmed Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    11,034
    Likes Received:
    1,632
    No to Kaman. Camby is an exception at his age. I could see us drafter a sg with our #14 pick unfortunately.........
     
  3. nadman89

    nadman89 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    9
    we have donuts dont we is he an nba center or pf bargniani like?
     
  4. onreego

    onreego Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    2,038
    My impression is that he is better suited for the 4. At a weight of 240, he'll get pushed around by the bigger C's in NBA. Obviously he can play spot minutes at the C but doesn't a front line of 7ft pf and center who could both be threats sound appealing?
     
  5. Mariachi ROCKET

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    9
    No! Get Gortat!!!!
     
  6. onreego

    onreego Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    2,038
    Actually, if he is acquirable, I'd prefer him over Kaman. Just not sure how much PHX would ask for.
     
  7. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,171
    Likes Received:
    15,029
    Minus the expiring contract, Caveman should have no place in our future.

    Aging vet, eater of capspace .... as others have already mentioned, goes against the rebuilding the Rockets SHOULD be doing.
     
    #27 Plowman, May 3, 2012
    Last edited: May 3, 2012
  8. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,942
    Likes Received:
    13,097
    McHale in his interview (posted in another thread) stated that we need to get athletic bigs (if we can). Kaman can block shots but I don't know if he'd qualify as athletic (thud, thud, thud, thud: HODOR!)

    Nor do I think we'll necessarily go after Nene again (expensive, not getting any younger).

    But someone more Nene than Kaman.

    Gortat'd be nice, but how badly does Phoenix want to tank?
     
  9. davidio840

    davidio840 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    3,881
    No. No. No.
     
  10. RocketsMAN!

    RocketsMAN! Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    204
    Ok, I'm convinced, Kaman is definitely not athletic enough for our ideal situation, "athletic, low-post scoring, lane-clogging, shot-blocking, good passing" PF or C. Yao was all of those except athletic. As long as we can get all of those except "athletic", I think that will be an upgrade to Scola/PPat or Camby/Dally. Motie may have the "athletic", but will he have "low-post scoring, lane-clogging, shot-blocking, good passing". Whichever he lacks, we'll need to find a 5 to complement him. That's why Scola/Yao was a complete-ish low-block for the Rockets.
     
  11. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,787
    Likes Received:
    22,593
    The moon. Gortat should have been considered for MIP this year. He's solid and they have their starting center for the future locked up on a very good contract.
     
  12. onreego

    onreego Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    2,038
    He definitely is not an athletic big. I like Gortat as well but it all depends on who they'd give up for him.

    Another option is that they can take a run at McGee (athletic big) but he's a knucklehead and also thinks he deserves a big pay day.

    Morey could finally decide this is the year to draft on size but whats the likelihood of that unless they win the lottery or move up high enough.

    Many responding with the Rockets SHOULD rebuild, but the reality of it is that they want to stay competitive. With that in mind, this was more of a 'is Kaman an upgrade from Dally?'
     
  13. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,787
    Likes Received:
    22,593
    Gorat wont happen. McGee getting an offer from Houston is a possibility, but I dont think they value him as high as him and his agent would think. He would be considered a "gamble" in the same token as T-Will, or Thabeet for that matter. He's not somebody they would bank on to be their future center.
     
  14. fv court

    fv court Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2002
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    26
    Toby Flenderson?[​IMG]
     
  15. onreego

    onreego Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    2,038
    Yeah, as you said earlier, the Suns would ask for the moon for Gortat. Big men like him are hard to come by for cheap. McGee has so much potential but needs to get his head on straight if that is even possible. Definitely do not see them banking their future on him but I do think he would be a better gamble than Thabust since for one he actually likes playing basketball. But the cost to gamble may be too much.
     
  16. dreamshakin

    dreamshakin Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    462
    Kaman isn't to shabby, but I don't believe it would help us moving forward. But we should try to deal Dalembert this offseason
     
  17. mr. 13 in 33

    mr. 13 in 33 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    10,617
    Likes Received:
    636
    theres an article i found that said new orleans should get rid of kaman and landry. bad thing is the article is from bleacher report
     
  18. Know Your Role

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    670
    No to Kaman unless it is our only choice. I agree the Rockets need to get all the height and muscle they can at C and PF. Mchale needs big guys, apprentice's that will call him maaaaaaster. I don't agree with every thing Coach did this year, but I do agree he needs more big guys. Real big guys, not guys that let people step on them and get away with it.
     
  19. RocketsMAN!

    RocketsMAN! Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    204
    (Stats are from this season only)
    Kaman is more consistant than Dally.
    Kaman younger by 1 year.
    Athletic: Kaman < Dally
    Blocks: Kaman = Dally
    Passing: Kaman > Dally (2 ast vs. 0.5 ast)
    Reb: Kaman = Dally
    Minutes Per Game: Kaman > Dally (27 vs 22)
    Points: Kaman > Dally (13 vs 8)

    I see upgrade. I also see Kaman as our closing 5 instead of Scola/Patterson. But that would also entail resigning Camby at a small contract.

    Kaman/Camby > Camby/Dally

    So if we can sign Kaman on a contract relative to what Dalembert's was, I think that is a win. Somewhere it was mentioned that it will be a buyer's market for bigs this offseason with so many 5s that are free agents. Morey may be able to get a good deal on another 5.
     
  20. onreego

    onreego Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,672
    Likes Received:
    2,038
    I saw this article as well. They weren't saying that NO should let Kaman go based on his performance but commented more on how he was unhappy with the flip flop decision of trading him and his overall role on the team.
     

Share This Page