The difference is an erect penis. When men are "raped" you're not told to sh*t yourself to keep the other one from being turned on. As a proud member of the whiskey di*k club, I can attest, it is impossible for a woman to rape you unless you are turned on.
To be crude, you still have an anus. Besides, I don't think anyone's been saying the boy was forcibly raped. It is a statutory rape case. Just because he wanted to have sex with her doesn't mean he wasn't exploited. But, she did get 8 years. I think that's adequate.
No she didnt she got six months, What you get and what you serve are totally different things, but I think its fair to say the latter is the ACTUAL punishment you receive, I mean she "got" 8 years so why didnt she serve it?
I think you are asking a rhetorical question (but I never know with you, boom ), but it was because she was a pretty female "rapist".
1. Would it be different if she looked like bea Arthur? 2. When these boys live a life seeing women as nothing but sex object . . . perhaps being a statutory rapist themselves. . . .don't say not [Hey i knwo u 14 and I'm 30 . . . I was boning a 30 yr old when I was your age] 3. What do you think this kid's attitude and mentality about sex and women will be from now on you folx should never complain about kids being oversex again Rocket River
