They're probably pretty close in value right now. Browsing the spurs forum they're extremely happy with Leonard(especially defensively), just as we are with Chandler. One thing Leonard has in his favor is that he's only 20 years old, and CP is what, 23 iirc? Looks like spurs made a great trade. Hill not starting in Indy, and putting up modest stats. Plus the spurs also got a 2nd rounder(Bertrans), and the rights to E.Lorbeck in Europe. Geesh. I'm happy to have Chandler, but it's awful close, and the age difference might be the swinger for me. Have to sleep on it some more though.
I never watch Kawhi play, but I think he plays D a little better than Parson and he make Parson look like Larry Bird on the offense. Am I right? So amma go with Parson over Kawhi
Exact same guy pretty much. I dont see why we have to take one or the other since we got Parsons and still got to draft Marcus morris.
Its basically a dumb question. Parsons and Leonard might be as close to each other in what they bring as can be and you got to draft someone else. You might ask why didnt they draft both of them? They could have instead of Marcus Morris. Dumb question when you include Parsons though.
I would pick a player just as good as Parsons every year regardless of what position he played, no matter what pick. Morey struck gold with this pick.
Genius. Almost on the level of Rudy Gay about to show the world he is on the level of Kevin Durant I will say that the difference between Portions and Leonard is almost the same as that between Gay and Durant Leonard and Durant are A++ Side players, Gay and Portions Z side players
At the moment I thought parsons wad better. Ofcourse this was 5 years ago. And much has changed. I never thought leonard would develop like this.. amazing.
