1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

CBS: Lakers Eye Landry??

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Nero, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. Possum

    Possum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    650
    Dont you think its a little unfair to be critical of Morey considering Landry's history of knee problems and the fact that he hadnt proved anything at the time of the contract? Foresight is 20/20.
     
  2. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,705
    Likes Received:
    3,038
    m_cable is one of the most level headed posters on this board. You can tell by the context of the post that he's giving Morey plenty of credit for all the good moves he's made. He's just saying he wishes we could have handled Landry's original contract situation different. I think we all feel that way.
     
  3. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,234
    Likes Received:
    4,243
    :confused:
     
  4. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    hey, it's better than foreskin being 20/20, right!
     
  5. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,311
    Likes Received:
    1,928
    The story doesn't even bother with fake "a source close to the Lakers...". I'm convinced this story was fed to the media by Landry's agent.
     
  6. carib

    carib Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    141

    hahaha thats a good one. The agent must be really crafty.
     
  7. pbthunder

    pbthunder Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,933
    Likes Received:
    39
    If this is legit, the Lakers must be willing to over-pay him. They wouldn't bother offering him something they expect the Rockets to match.

    The Rockets will not re-sign Landry at all costs. For example, if the Lakers give him the full MLE, I suspect the Rox will let him go. They'd be better off using that money on a 2/3 or a PG, if there's one out there they want. As far as that goes, being in a $5 million better cap position would be better than paying him the full MLE.
     
  8. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    I think Morey's done a decent job so far, but he definitely made a mistake by not getting a team option on Landry's 2nd season. There's absolutely no downside for the club by getting a team option for a player. I'm not even sure why he did it. It must have been a trade-off for Landry's agent to agree to a lower guaranteed amount.

    A deal like that could have saved the club a couple hundred thousand if Landry ended up getting cut, but will probably end up costing the team at least a million dollars to re-sign him early. Face it, Morey completely miscalculated the risk analysis of the Landry deal. And it's put us in a tough situation that we didn't have to be in.
     
  9. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    796
    Shouldn't the team be more worried about the getting Artest than Landry? If they want landry, lets just sign and trade for turiaf at 2.5m and call it a day.
     
  10. ooliverb1

    ooliverb1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wonder if Landry didn't want the team option in the contract. I remembered he was unhappy about the contract Rockets offered him...
     
  11. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    Like I said, I'm guessing that Landry's agent gave up some guaranteed money in exchange for Morey dropping the 2nd year team option. There's really no other defensible reason to give up the leverage of a team option. However you slice it, it was a bad move.
     
  12. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,311
    Likes Received:
    1,928
    The contract wasn't guaranteed in it's first year. Landry would only take a guaranteed contract. I assume there Rockets would've liked to add a team option on the 2nd year but the agent would only take a guaranteed deal in both years.
     
  13. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    Like I said, it's speculation, but I suspect that Morey gave up the 2nd year team option in order to give up less guaranteed in the 1st year. Otherwise there's no reason to give up the team option. Virtually all 2nd round guys have team options for year two, so Landry's agent didn't have the leverage to force two guaranteed years. Morey must have given up the team option. That's they only way this makes any sense.
     
  14. BetterThanEver

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931
    Likes Received:
    189
    Morey was right after all. After only 1-2 month of 15+ minutes/g and Landry goes out with a busted knee.
     
  15. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,311
    Likes Received:
    1,928
    Landry's agent mentioned the first year wasn't guaranteed to the Chron. There's a search engine for their articles on their site.
     
  16. rocketshopeful

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,515
    Likes Received:
    22

    I tend to agree with this idea. Until Landry shows that he can develop a money jumper, I don't see any value in giving him a sizeable contract. He is still undersized for his position, and for the near future, will be relying on pure explosiveness with an iffy knee.
     
  17. Possum

    Possum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    650
    Under the circumstances Morey did what most GM's would of done. It was a calculated gamble that he lost and I bet he is glad he lost. What do you think the chances were that Landry contributed as much as he did? I’m understand m_cables point and I'm not dogging him for his opinion, just disagreeing with him.

    Just being silly. Hindsight is 20/20. There is that better? :p
     
  18. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    it wasn't about Morey not wanting to guarantee Carl. My gut says it really was Les Alexander's call. He took on a lot of money in the summer, and didn't want to pay the tax.

    In the end, the team got under the tax by the trade deadline anyhow... it wasn't a great decision to not have a 2nd year, but I still highly doubt the consequence is anything more than the Rockets paying Landry a few millions more. (Frankly, there is little chance they sign a full MLE player anyway... in fact, in all of the NBA, there were only 3 or 4 full MLE signings last year).
     

Share This Page