1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Casserly Gone...

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Stevierebel, May 9, 2006.

  1. Stevierebel

    Stevierebel Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    119
    We all expected this...from profootballtalk.com


    CASSERLY OUT IN HOUSTON

    A league source tells us that the Texans and G.M. Charley Casserly officially have parted ways after a six-year relationship, which preceded by more than two full years the team's official arrival to the NFL.

    For now, we don't know whether the move is being characterized as a resignation or a termination. Our guess is that it will be described to the media as voluntary.

    Several weeks back, we reported that Casserly would be fired after the draft. Our report prompted a strong denial from the team and from owner Bob McNair. Our prediction at the time was that all parties were hoping to preserve the appearance that Casserly's ultimate departure was not in any way forced.

    His name has been mentioned as a potential replacement for Art Shell in the league office, but we've heard that the rumors of Casserly's candidacy for that specific position trace not to the Park Avenue, but to Casserly himself.

    And based on things we're hearing it now appears that the Texans will make a run at Broncos assistant G.M. Rick Smith before moving on to other candidates. Some league insiders believe that the Broncos would never give Smith permission to leave, and other league insiders believe that the Texans don't (or at least shouldn't) want Smith given his close relationship with new head coach Gary Kubiak.
     
  2. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,810
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    if they fired casserly after reeves and letting him be in the draft room I will really start to question mcnair's leadership. hopefully for this organization's sake it was voluntary.
     
  3. dsnow23

    dsnow23 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    68
    It really is hard to believe you'd let someone have a say in your draft if you knew they were on the way out. Regardless of who's decision it is. Maybe his opinion didn't matter and McNair and Kubiak were making the draft decisions? (Hopefully more Kubiak than McNair).
     
  4. thegary

    thegary Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    10,352
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    could the texans please give us a reason to believe that they have even the slightest idea what they are doing?
     
  5. Creepy Crawl

    Creepy Crawl Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    324
    Any ideas on whos gonna replace him ?
     
  6. msn

    msn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,726
    Likes Received:
    2,093
    Wow. I mean, wow.

    All year long we whine for Casserly to be gone, and now that he is, the only responses are "the Texans don't know what they're doing."

    Perhaps we don't know what we want?
     
  7. GRENDEL

    GRENDEL Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    17,215
    Likes Received:
    4,719
  8. Miguel

    Miguel Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,625
    Likes Received:
    140
    No...that couldn't be it!
     
  9. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    35,760
    Likes Received:
    7,845
    Yeah, I'm not sure what all the outrage is. From all accounts, this was Kubiak's draft - not Casserly's.

    We all wanted him gone. We all knew he was going to be gone. Now he's gone. So, what's the problem again? :confused:
     
  10. moligity

    moligity Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2002
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    28
    ^^^^ crybabies like to cry.
     
  11. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,810
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    again the problem was he was involved with the draft on his way out. I highly doubt he wasn't . He was also involved in signing free-agents. tell me this since you are so :confused: , what's the point of keeping him around this long if he didn't have any involvement.
     
  12. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,810
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    i mean you can say what you want, but why would a gm and team part ways AFTER a draft and free agency. it makes 0 sense.
     
  13. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    The draft is a year long scouting process, and general managers compile lists on their own through their own observations and not through looking at a couple of ESPN Insider lists like so many of the internet's "draft experts" do. It's not that simple, but people sadly don't realize that and throw hissy fits when a supposed fourth round talent falls to the bottom of the sixth round and their team doesn't take him.

    Anyway, as I understand it, if a general manager were to leave... all those evaluations would leave with him. If that's the case, and I've read it is in multiple articles, it's probably smarter to let him go before the start of a new draft cycle instead of letting him go midway through the cycle (January), starting over from scratch and possibly risking secrets getting leaked.

    Again, I'm not sure that's how it is, but that's the logic I've heard before. And, if true, it makes a lot of sense.
     
  14. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,810
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    I understand the draft is a long process, but when an employee is leaving an organization they are not responsible for any decisions that affect that organizations future. basically now you have a draft (that included the number one pick) that no one in that organization is responsible for.
     
  15. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    I think they made it very clear, particularly with the number one pick, that the player selected would be the one Kubiak wanted.
     
  16. arkoe

    arkoe (ง'̀-'́)ง

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    10,373
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    I'm glad I don't have to see him on the news any more. I complained about it last night when they interviewed him on the Smith signing.
     
  17. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,810
    Likes Received:
    3,013
    so they made it clear when every interview I heard on the decision was with casserly. or was it made clear when casserly was the front man saying it had nothing to do with signability, after it was made clear when they brought him in that they said signability could come into play.

    you're right, they made it abundantly clear. how could I think casserly had anything to do with this draft?
     
  18. thegary

    thegary Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    10,352
    Likes Received:
    2,358

    wow, i mean wow! our track record as an organization sucks. what do we want? how about a competitive football team.
     
  19. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,796
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    I'm not saying Casserly wasn't a factor at all. Certainly, he was. All I'm saying is that he wasn't the only factor... it's not as simple as there being no one in the organization accountable for the pick now that he's gone.
     
  20. Plowman

    Plowman Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    12,436
    Likes Received:
    13,426
    How about Dan Reeves?
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now