1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Can We Reform Corporations to Make them Responsible?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Nov 7, 2013.

  1. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    Just need to separate corporation from state. Right now, corporations have too much influence in gov't. We need a way to prevent corporations from writing laws by basically bribing officials.
     
  2. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,172
    Likes Received:
    48,351
    I understand that and as both an owner and employee of a corporation, a small one. What I am saying is that standard needs to be looked at more. For example it does seem like with the banking crisis some banks are being held responsible but not a lot of executives are. As I said at large corporations there seems little consequence for the actions of corporations on their executives.
     
  3. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Sounds good. In addition once lobbied by a corporation you cannot work with them until ten years later or something similar.

    No money for reelection and no employment either. In other words make it so they cannot materially reward the politician personally, contribute money to future campaigns or threaten to give money to future opponents.
     
  4. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,131
    Likes Received:
    22,609
    So people will take risks more proportionate to their ability to cover the potential losses? Why is that a bad thing?

    Is it ridiculous to think some projects are too big for some countries? After all, the government just takes your money and funds those projects. Isn't it fairer for people to have a say in these things on a case by case basis? Surely if the country needs a train, a large partnership can be found that would want to build it and profit off it? Why limit their liability? It's not like those losses disappear - someone has to bear that cost, and if it's not the corporation, then it's indirectly the general public.

    Also, nothing would make me happier than for that "some Dutch shipping company" to have disappeared into thin air.
     
  5. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Typical bumper sticker abstraction. I swear sometimes there must be a catechism of a limited number of libertarian slogans.

    Red lights are so paternalistic doncha know?
     
  6. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    So the only things which should be funded are those which gain the immediate support of the people?
     
  7. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,765
    Likes Received:
    16,390
    So you think only rich people should be able to start and own companies? Corporate ownership spreads wealth throughout society by allowing the average person to share in the profits of a large entity.
     
  8. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Are you seriously trying to claim that companies would continue following environmental protection laws if the EPA and other enforcement mechanisms didn't exist?

    Delusion, thy name is Commodore.
     
  9. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,830
    Likes Received:
    20,489
    This nation has a history, and in its history, the exact types of checks have been tried before, and it didn't work. It failed miserably.
     
    #69 FranchiseBlade, Nov 11, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2013
  10. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,172
    Likes Received:
    48,351
    I've always said that anyone who reads Ayn Rand should also be required to read Upton Sinclair.

    The Jungle should be bundled with Atlas Shrugged
     
    #70 rocketsjudoka, Nov 11, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2013
    1 person likes this.
  11. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,833
    Likes Received:
    41,296
    Look for an "Official Blade Runner Pat on the Back," judo. Perfect post given the context!
     
  12. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    24,008
    Likes Received:
    11,225
    One of my best friend's makes these types of arguments too. Can you actually prove that it works? We've tried that before. It didn't work. I'm open to anything you've got.
     
  13. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,605
    Likes Received:
    17,579
    Left gives the government all this power and is surprised when money flows to influence it.

    Take away government's power to help corporations and their influence will disappear.
    • Outlaw all corporate bailouts, subsidies, guaranteed loans.
    • All regulations over $X amount must be voted on by congress within six months of issuance

    Simple,transparent, fair.

    Do this and you will see the corporate lobbyist industry dry up in a hurry. Why spend money to influence government if it has no power to enrich you?
     
  14. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Yes, since you're implying that an individual's political agenda is being promoted rather than the economic goals of a corporation with multiple chairmen of varying political views since the original acquisition.
     
  15. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    24,008
    Likes Received:
    11,225
    So basically you want corporations running everything? How do you feel about the robber barron era? Was it an era you would like to bring back?
     
  16. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    Wouldn't "So androids dream of electric sheep" pat on the back be more contextual here?
     
  17. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Hopefully they can make the argument why the Congress can do certain things that will benefit the company and also the average American , since the Congress is supposed to be there to help the average American and not just the wealthy/ corporate elite.
     
  18. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,105
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    No not at all. Many times a companies freedom has to be limited to protect children, consumers, employee, the American economy and to "promote the general welfare" and other quaint Constitutional ideals that predate these gigantic corporations.
     
  19. brantonli24

    brantonli24 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,236
    Likes Received:
    68
    Entrepreneurship. The fact that people can dive in, take their ideas, use the invested money, and if that ideas fail, NOT be wholly liable for every single penny of debt, means that you can have innovation take place! If everybody had to solicit thousands of people to cover the millions of dollars required for a heavy investment, we would get nowhere in terms of innovation of any kind!

    For all the successful entrepreneurs now, they all had to fail over and over before they succeeded, and they could only do so because of limited liability, that the corporation is burdened with the debt, and that they can learn from their past mistakes and build a better firm next time.

    I'm as socially liberal as the next guy, but advocating getting rid of corporations is just downright silly. Do corporations have undue power in politics? YES. Should we get rid of them entirely? No.
     
  20. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,833
    Likes Received:
    41,296
    Don't be a Dick, dude.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now