1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Call of Duty or Halo?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by G-Money, Nov 25, 2010.

Tags:
?

Call of Duty or Halo?

  1. Call of Duty

    50 vote(s)
    64.1%
  2. Halo

    20 vote(s)
    25.6%
  3. None of them

    8 vote(s)
    10.3%
  1. htownrox1

    htownrox1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    8,282
    Likes Received:
    6,414
    How so? Becaue you can't noob toob with one man army? Because you can't boost to get nukes? Because there's no danger close?
     
  2. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    So Black Ops is Epic because MW2 had a lot of bull**** in it?

    That makes sense.
     
  3. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841

    See I liked the Arbiter character...and Halo Legends helps to shed some back story on that role within the Elite/Covenant culture. My only beef was, not that you played him, but that you played him an equal amount of time as the Chief. Probably should have been more like 70-30 or 75-25 split. Loved the cut scenes in Halo 2, Halo 3 had a little cheese toward the end but was still fine, and Halo 1 is good but is definitely dated to me (and so repetitive). But one of my favorite parts in the whole series is storming the beach on The Cartographer mission. Reach, played it twice, and it really does have a tight, focused, gripping and simplistic story. I only wish they would have involved the Chief in the cut-scenes in the beginning and especially end.

    COD is awesome, but the franchise as a whole (not just MW) is not as nearly intriguing to me as Halo as a whole.
     
  4. Pull_Up_3

    Pull_Up_3 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,089
    Likes Received:
    308
    Lets see COD takes no skill and halo does

    I pick halo
     
  5. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    Pretty ignorant comment. They both take plenty of skill if you want to be considered "good".
     
  6. dback816

    dback816 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,506
    Likes Received:
    160
    That's ridiculous. For all the praise you give Halo, you crap all over it by comparing it to Gears.

    Halo does have a good setting and some likable characters. Gears have none. Well, maybe they will have some now that they have female Gears in 3 now.

    Console shooters take zero skill.
     
  7. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841

    It's only ridiculous if you haven't read the novels. There's a very rich story there that never was really told all that well in the games. Hopefully that'll change with the third one because Karen Traviss is helping to write it.

    Again when I'm looking at a game, a lot of the times I'm looking at the experience, the story first...that story might not necessarily flesh itself out primarily in the game alone. The Gears novels made me WANT to play the game even more. And they are a big reason why I was let down by what happened with Marcus toward the end of the second game. But there also a big reason why I've come to love these characters so much. Hell even the two biggest hard asses who seemingly have zero depth, Marcus and Baird, have a lot more soul now after reading the novels.
     
  8. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    sure thing bro.
     
  9. desi tmac91

    desi tmac91 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,206
    Likes Received:
    240
    Halo because Halo 2 was just awesome.
     
  10. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    .....
     
  11. br0ken_shad0w

    br0ken_shad0w Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    317
    Neither because there's plenty of FPS out there besides those two. :rolleyes:
     
  12. htownrox1

    htownrox1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    8,282
    Likes Received:
    6,414
    It's epic because there is no bull in the game that ruins it. In Black Ops you have to actually have skill to take down your oppenent. You can't rely on "easy kills" like in MW2. BO really maximizes your ability to use guns in fps, and see how good you really are..

    BTW, how bout them Tigers? ;)
     
  13. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    Chicago.

    The Patriots murdered them.
     
  14. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,642
    Likes Received:
    7,191
    Master Chief was in Cryogenics and taken on the Pillar of Autumn during the fall of Reach. You can see him in the cut scene following the 10th mission.

    Halo because it has the way better multiplayer, it has Co-op campaign, and the World War series of COD wasn't fun to me.
     
  15. FFz

    FFz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,411
    Likes Received:
    69
    Starcraft2
     
  16. HombreDeHierro

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    42
    I bet you die a lot because you don't know how to play
     
  17. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841

    That's the thing...it doesn't make sense that he was in cryogenics. He had a pretty important role in Fall of Reach...and while I certainly didn't want them to focus on his mission, cause Halo: Reach wasn't his story, it would have been nice to tie the game into the novel a little bit better there at the end.
     
  18. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    I dont think thats the case with him.
     
  19. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    Will you teach me?
     
  20. Anticope

    Anticope Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    They're just very different FPS that are hard to compare in many ways. One of the things that I've always liked about Halo is the simplicity of it. Everybody starts off with the same guns and there's no perks like in COD. Call of Duty on the other hand, is a more realistic shooter, especially considering the fact that you can kill your opponents pretty quickly whereas in Halo it seems to take an entire clip to bring an enemy down.

    Also, it depends on which specific games in the series you're talking about. Halo 1 was an all-time classic game that sort revolutionized the FPS, but it's hurt by the fact that you couldn't play online and Halo 2 I thought was pretty good, not quite as good as the first, but it had alot of elements from Halo 1 that I liked. Halo 3 was total garbage and I consider Reach to be OK but not along the lines of the first 2 in the series.

    Call of Duty really didn't seem to really become huge until the first Modern Warfare. Things like killstreaks and perks were great additions until they just seemed to go way overboard in Modern Warfare 2. Black Ops somewhat fixed that issue in that people can't get as out of control with kill streaks, which is good. Also, I've always been a fan of the Call of Duty maps over those in Halo.

    I've been a big fan of both of these series, but to be honest, I find myself playing Call of Duty more these days just due to the fact that I strongly prefer Black Ops over Reach and that I can't even play my 2 favorite games in the Halo series online anymore.
     

Share This Page