Ha that picture looks like something from Forrest Gump. If I knew how to Photoshop, I'd do it. I don't like Bush but there needs to be something better than that.
That's the problem. You want to make something out of nothing. If there is something here then let the punishment happen. Your statements are so telling that you want to "take every advantage of this" and use it regardless of what the truth is.
i think the truth is that bush misinformed the public to go to war. i think the truth is that cheney made up that misinformation. i think the truth is that there are systematic abuses which led to abu ghuraib. i think the notion of gitmo is taking a dump on international law. i think cutting funding for the poorest and for the most needed programs (education) is the truth. i think having an illegal pre-emptive strike to enforce UN resolutions is disgusting. i think having illegal wiretaps is well illegal. i think our two trillion dollar foray into iraq is gonna end up ruining our economy. i think the way we treat our vets is disgusting. thats what i think the truth is. so yeah if the only issue that can 'stick' is corruption i damn sure do wanna take advantage of it. this isn't some moral church toy drive. this is politics. and if that means that you have to use alternate red-meat issues in order to accomplish legitimate goals...well sucks. thats the nature of the beast. we've been getting our asses kicked because of these issues. gay marriage won bush the election last year. sorry if i dont feel too bad for using corruption (which is absolutely a legitimate concern) to nail this administration.
Remember when Abramoff chum, Tom Delay first got in trouble, and his people were trying to claim it was just partisan attacks on Delay who had done absolutely nothing wrong? We don't hear that charge too much anymore.
Remember when Democrats tried to say that Abramoff had NO ties to Democrats and that he ONLY dealt with Republicans? ... That was cool.
I still say it's the truth. Taking donations from an Abramoff client is NOT the same as taking bribes and being influenced by Abramoff to enact legislation.
I don't know guys...this is looking bad. Here's another photo of Bush and Abramoff: Abramoff is the one with the yellow arrow.
That actually makes sense as it is clear Bush has given the business of governing to the lobbyists and other hired hands. Perhaps if Bush had been engaged and actually in DC instead of chopping brush in Crawford, Katrina would not have been so bad.
Can this truth be proven? If I give you a dollar, how can the outside world not construe this as a bribe or influence for something...It is taciturned of sense to conjecture a non-confirmed commitance sans collaboration.
I was actually trying to decide which one I should say was Bush but figured I was doomed either way. I applaud your effort to bring Katrina into this though. That was something I did not expect. Obi-Wan has taught you well.
why did you take a picture of youself Tex? You sure are looking rough compared to the last pic of you...
