Really? This needs its own thread? 1. All of Clutchfans knows this. 2. This can go into the post game analysis.
There's a reason he never played anything but garbage minutes. Unfortunately, when your 2 centers both go down and you only have 3 undersized PF's trying to hold down the fort, you're forced to bring in scrubs who wouldn't play otherwise. And I agree with the others. This was pretty apparent to everyone already and it didn't warrant its own thread.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o2eolrRmNX8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o2eolrRmNX8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
They just exposed our weakness inside. Dorsey would helped out a lot more than Cook. We needed some muscle underneath....not some pansy like Cook.
Bryan Cook doesn't deserve his own thread... I disagree with the decision to play him in the role he was given in game 5.
Look at his track record: He hasn't done anything since he's come into the NBA. It should of been Dorsey providing some muscle underneath with Hayes.
He is under contract, so there is a good chance we will see him next year. Cook should only be playing if he is guarding a big who doesn't have a post up game. His shooting skills (despite his performance today) have some value.
what's next, complaining about hayes not having an offensive game? We dont exactly have an unlimited number of all stars to keep throwing out there, at some point we had to throw in third stringers, it should be expected that they're going to suck, especially against the Lakers' starting unit and even their 2nd team..
