1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Brent Barry: Can he produce..really?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Ready, Sep 15, 2008.

Tags:
  1. Ready

    Ready Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    0
    I need some kind of calming words or stats to help me see clearly how effective BB can be for us this season.

    -Is he really our answer for increased shooting percentage?
    -Isn't he old now?
    -How many good solid years does he have left in the tank?
    -How good do you think his numbers will be this season?

    I'm not trying to judge BB or slam him or the Rockets by saying he can't do anything
    ...it's just that I haven't been able to follow his play at all for years. It's just a gut instinct of mine to feel that the signing seems overrated?

    ClutchFans help me see the light.
     
  2. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,919
    He'll do better than Steve Novack - that's for sure.
     
  3. Trojan

    Trojan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is for the playoff gmaes, so don't care too much about his performance in regular season.
     
  4. Shay

    Shay Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    1
    He played last year only 31 games because of an injury and because he was traded.
    3 years prior that he was pretty durable.

    If he is healthy he will be great for 15-20 minutes off the bench , he is the best shooter on the team and he will know how to run the offense and get the ball to Yao.

    I wouldn't be surprised if he turns out to suck though , he is old and had an injury last year.

    Every year at least one off season acquisition turns out to suck , lets hope it's Barry and not Artest.
     
  5. Marsarinian

    Marsarinian Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,072
    Likes Received:
    245
    He is old, but Brent Barry is not the kind of high risk/reward signing. If we want him to start and play 30 minutes a game, then no, he will not be effective at all. But for 15 to 20 minutes, he can definitely bring the shooting and leadership on the table. We knew what we were getting when we got him, and barring injury, he's probably going to do just that.
     
  6. ParaSolid

    ParaSolid Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    4,594
    Likes Received:
    1,719
    If he can bring what brother Jon brought to the Rockets 3-4 years ago, then I'd be ecstatic. I hope he's as entertaining as Jon because I still remember that year fondly.
     
  7. TTRocket

    TTRocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    He will probably be more effective than Head, at least in the playoffs. He can also play backup PG allowing us to play Battier,Mac, Artest at the same time.
     
  8. Sherlock

    Sherlock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    19
    If he was a starter, then I might be worried more about his health. But, I think he'll be a great locker room presence - he's dang funny - will be some instant offense off the bench, can step in at PG, can cover a few positions for depth, and great at hitting the three to spread things out.
     
  9. Ikorose

    Ikorose Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    1
    He replaces Luther Head in the rotation.

    You will start to notice a slight positive difference in the regular season, but when playoff time comes, it will pay massive dividends to not have Head on the court.
     
  10. BrooksBall

    BrooksBall Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    20,568
    Likes Received:
    256
    I don't see why you think this signing was overrated. People have barely mentioned Brent Barry's name since Artest was signed. At times, I tend to forget we even signed him because of all the attention on Artest. Plus, we didn't pay him much at all. This move falls under the category of low risk/medium-high reward as far as I'm concerned.

    Basically, what is your basis for saying this acquistion was overrated? Who is overrating it? Where is it being overrated?
     
  11. GermanRoxFan

    GermanRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    37
    something like 15 - 20 minutes off the bench for 60 games while averaging about 7-2-2 with around 40 % on 3ps would be a success and a very valuable addition.

    the thing is, if there's any player where age really doesn't matter it's brent barry. in his years with the spurs he wasn't a valuable bench player because of his athleticism or his defense. no, he contributed with smarts, sound basketball basics and a great shooting touch. all of this can't be taken away by father time. ;)
     
  12. Dinki

    Dinki New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is a qualified combo guard and should shot better than Head in playoff.
     
  13. stephen94

    stephen94 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering he can play defense and has better handles. Sure!
     
  14. baller4life315

    baller4life315 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,655
    Likes Received:
    2,942
    He's better than Luther Head in every facet of the game.

    Better shooter? Check
    Higher basketball IQ? Check
    Versatility? Check
    Experience/intangibles? Check
    Ability to handle the rock? Check

    Even if he's only here to essentially replace Luther it's still a worthwhile and cost effective move. How can a move like this be overrated whenever the guy signs for what....$1.9M for the season?
     
  15. stephen94

    stephen94 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Luther does have one thing.

    He's a hell of a lot better in the regular season. I say play Luther in the reg. season and play Brent in the playoffs.
     
  16. kaitanuva

    kaitanuva Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,790
    Likes Received:
    101
    Barry is an exceptional 3 point shooter at 40% career; he will be able to replace Novak's 42%. Barry's age will have its advantages and disadvantages; he has the experience over Novak, however, he will not have the energy of Novak. All in all, he is mostly a Novak replacement.

    Off topic: If Francis is going to be at least half of what he used to be, I wouldn't even consider Head being part of the rotation in critical games such as the playoffs. (7.1% FG for .8 PPG anyone?)

    PG Rotation (Playoffs):
    Rafer Alston > Steve Francis > Aaron Brooks

    PG Rotation (Regular Season):
    Rafer Alston > Steve Francis > Luther Head
     
  17. baller4life315

    baller4life315 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,655
    Likes Received:
    2,942
    :confused:
     
  18. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    17,961
    Likes Received:
    6,977
    Maybe
    Yes
    1 maybe 2
    5 points, 2 assists, 2 rebounds

    His biggest impact will be made when close games are on the line and he will be pivotal to our championship run in the playoffs.
     
  19. Tmac-is-numero1

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes.
    He will be our leading scorer
    :D
     
  20. R0cketC1ty123

    R0cketC1ty123 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    he can knock down those threes at crunch time and provide an extra boost on the bench andddd he is an upgrad over luther
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now