[Breaking News] Anne Hathaway Loves Backdoor.... Sushi.

Do you actually think this doesn't happen? Or do you think it is always only the guy who initially proposes it?

 

well then why do you keep upholding it..?

 

I say that if you like it, and the man and the woman do it voluntary its ok, fine with them. If a man wants to and he demands the girl to do it, thats not right, but if the both agree, why not?

Years ago, people that had a tattoo, were unrespectable for some many people. They say that a man or a woman that did that to him/herself was not very respectable, now the time has changed, is normal to people have tattoos.

Many years ago, girls that wear mini-skirts were disrespectful, now its ok to wear them.

So the culture ideas change through the years.

If you want to bisexual go, do it, just respecting the other people preferences, If you respect other people its ok, you can do whatever you want to do with your body.

 

I don't, see the thing is I'm not saying your wrong, I am merely challenging your matter of fact, I am saying that you have no water to your argument. You're matter of fact is that I'm right until you can prove me wrong, that is a fallacious argument that tends to beat those not classically trained. I am not one of them, and I ask, how can you ask others to prove that your argument is wrong and yet conject that it is anything but a fallacy of ignorance.

 

...one more reason to love the hangout

 

Wait, it has come to my attention that you may not know what the fallacy of ignorance is, good sir, do you know what I speak of?

 

the fact that you ask me.. makes you seem uncertain yourself..

you don't know if that does happen.. i don't know... 6-7 pages worth of arguing.. no one has provided example 1 of it's occurance, let alone enough to warrant the frequency to call it "common"... and even less to detract from my initial remark..

so if my examples bare more truth.. on to what constitutes a compromise of respect.. or loss of.. to what's the most common occurance.. reaction... and the most common impetus to the suggestion.. and submission of/to this act..not just for me.. but for you.. and everyone else here.. females.. or males speaking from their experiences with other females.. how issit logical to discredit my stance.. more than the others.. who seem to argue mostly with theory.. reaching analysis... and "hey it could happen, times are a changing"..type reasoning.. from every angle it's been approached.. the pleasure angle for the woman.. the love angle.. the emotional angle..

and it has been an poorly pitiful end.. to see all my detractors come with absolutely nothing of merit.. or more significance.. only to retreat with white flags of ignorance.. after instigating this whole thing.. when my very viable claim.. which has come out shining more brightly after all this.. of "no respectable woman would have any part of it'.. was deemed "ridiculous"...


and yes.. the whole thing is now just to a plain laughable point.. I don't even care anymore.. about my stance.. yes... about arguing it with the children of limited capacity here... no.. to each their own.. and other bull.. if it appeases the majority...

 

Edit: Wrong thread

 

I thought this would be interesting to add in here, just so we can see how many non-respectable people there are:

According to a 2002 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, among adults 25-44 years of age, 40 percent of men and 35 percent of women have had anal sex with an opposite-sex partner.

Study can be found here:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf

 

My good sir, you're arguments impose ad hominem (the second) and fallacy of ignorance(the first bolded piece) and then proceed to say you've actually argued something. Children? My sir, I've studied under great men, Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and many other men. If you think any of these men offered solutions, you are sadly mistaken. You on the other hand offer solutions and I flock to you, just as they would, and yet you waste my time. If you know nothing, just admit it and the questions will end, but as long as you profess to know, as long as you profess that your arguments are true, just as Socrates did to Euthephro I do to you, I ask you questions. My friend, when you have finally decided to actually enlighten yourself and look into philosophy, then and only then you can argue something, until then, you are ignorant and not worth my time. I have wasted enough time on you.

 

What makes it seem like I was uncertain myself? I think you misunderstood my post; it was more disbelief that you think that it never happens. It really doesn't seem like that rare of an occurrence to me, but maybe we are from different generations, demographics, or backgrounds? I really am shocked that you are unaware of this. You may want to consider that you might be ignorant on this subject. It has happened to me, on more than one occasion. But since that is unverifiable unless I take you into my bedroom, I didn't think personal experience belonged in this argument.

 

I really don't know how more people have not yet discovered that Hmm is probably the biggest arrogant blowhard on here. And that's saying something as a person who lurks in the D&D as well.

 

Where this is headed:

 

I understand, but as a philosopher and scientist I search out those with truth and answers on their side, only to pick their brains and understand the world. Unfortunately, all the men I've run into are frauds.

 

hardly.. I go by no restrictions of growth... my objectivity.. or "opinions" include.. but are never.. never.. limited.. to my immediate experiences.. or upbringing..

and..

"seem" being the operative word.. and you're focused on the act being done itself.. not on the reasoning behind it.. I'm really not repeating my stance on the issue again.. and this is my last reply in this thread.. if you personally want to discuss it further.. pm's or what have you.. but I seriously doubt you do.. by your post here.. and what it's indicitive of..

aa your shock verifies.. that you.. like everyone else.. have not been paying attention to everything i've said... nor to what actually instigated this argument..


as for myco... whatever makes all better..

 

Hey...if it gets Hmm through the night to think that "the one he has come to call his love" is respectable compared to Shady Pink...or any other living breathing woman. And that her behaviors and his behaviors with her are somehow morally and spiritually superior.

Lets let him maintain the illusion. He obviously needs it to get him through the night.


(waits for ...tragic really...responce )

 

It's not that complicated, really. Some women just like it.

 

Franchise3 please read between the lines. The man makes no arguments, he offers up no truth, all of his conjecture stems from limited experience and rhetorical analysis. Seeing as how he cannot defend himself, and has evidently said he concedes, we must remain humble and let him be. He chooses to remain ignorant, we must respect his wishes, otherwise, we'd be imposing our own will, and then who would we be? Well, we'd be like him.

 

A fitting response for your "position" in this thread.

 

I know, I know. I was just hoping that he would come forward with some semblance of a logical argument because honestly, I would be interested in reading a well thought out, logical argument that takes the contrary position to everyone else in this thread. Obviously you are a smart kid (if I read correctly, you go to Duke and appear to be well-versed in philosophical arguments and logic), and I have been trained in argument structure and spotting logical fallacies, but for the life of me I am still not understanding the foundation of his argument, and you appear to be having as much success.

I am beginning to think Hmm may be having some sort of logical disconnect because the ideas floating around in this thread are so far out of his reality - a form of cognitive dissonance, if you will.