[Breaking News] Anne Hathaway Loves Backdoor.... Sushi.

Just another way to embarrass the Disney empire?

 

I told you so.

 

How do you have any idea what women want? And you would be surprised as to what some wome like...ones that are not "whores"

Basically, you have no grounds or basis for your argument beyond your own personal opinion.

 

Trying to be respectful here, which I'm not sure you deserve considering your @ssholish response to Shadypink who considering you are talking about respect deserves a respectful answer more than essentially being called a slut.

Have you ever done things to or for your signifigant other that you otherwise might not do or even consider normally? You say that people are being selfish and narrow minded yet if anything your stance is the one that is exceedingly selfish and narrow minded when you say that it is you who presume what is to be acceptable and that you won't debase a romantic relationship with what you feel falls out of your own narrow base of what you consider respectable.

A loving romantic relationship should certainly be about more than sex but like it or not we are sexual beings and sex is an important part of a loving romantic relationship. Not everyone has the same taste when it comes to sex but part of being with someone that you care about is that you want to please them and if that means being willing to indulge in something that maybe you don't really care for then that is part of sexual understanding that is very important to intimacy.

That you reduce it to a matter of trading sexual favors rather than looking at it as wanting to please your partner tells me that either one you haven't been in the type of relationship where you are comfortable enough and feel close enough to your partner to be willing to indulge your partner or two that you are so locked into your mindset regarding a view of what is respectable sexually as to have a hang-up or three that this is really all just a game to you to pump up your own ego as a contrarian.

Its not my place to judge you, even though you have gone ahead and judged Shadypink. I'm just telling you what has been some hard earned wisdom on my part regarding what I've found it takes to keep a good relationship.

 

Umm, some guys in a basketball forum in Houston have spent over ten pages and two+ days talking about her.

THAT'S why.

LOL

 

Oh snap, I thought you were a woman...WTF are you arguing for then...
Obviously, nothing that is said here is taken seriously or is appreciated for what it is...An opinion...Everyone has them, but trying to defend something that doesn't apply to you seem silly...Am I missing something?

 

Someone please end this thread already.
If someone wants to debate the decisions involved in the act Ms. Hathaway enjoys then please start a new thread for that.

 

Please, close down the thread... one ignorant poster making a blanket statement for all women should not be able to continue arguing when he brings nothing to the table... and R2K, you need to either kick his ass, or kick his ass out... dude is disrespectin' SEVERELY.

 

Actually, she's the only girl I've had anal sex with, and probably the last. It's funny because she wanted it, and I didn't. She was harshly against contraceptives (she had a gag reflex), and to her this was a solution to the problem. I was a 17 year old who was getting sex, I didn't really question anything in life back then. I've probably had anal sex over 200 times and sadly I'm not that into it. I actually don't like doing it so much. The thing is, I don't judge others that do it, I don't automatically assume I'm better than they are, and I hate it when people do that. If I was dating a girl who was perfect for me in every way, and wanted anal sex, I'd do it because I wanna make it work with her. Does that make her a slut? Does that make me a jerk? No. Then why does it change if the roles are reversed? Personally, this place gets really lonely if you don't have someone to hang out with, I want friends so I'm done with the whole "I'm better than you" complex.

 

Hmm,

Hmmmmm.. There are two possibilities here:

1. You really believe what you have been saying.

2. You are actually just being a troll, enjoying stirring people up by deliberately saying stupid garbage.


In the first case, whether you believe your *opinions* to be equal to facts or not, your error is in arrogantly declaring your opinions to be accepted facts, which not only are they NOT, it is not even close to being true. You are so far off as to make Possibility #2 extremely likely.

In the second case, we should all beg forgiveness from the Forum Gods for feeding the troll and allowing such a travesty of a thread to live this long.

The thing is, 'Hmm', and what I find most amusing, is that you reveal far more insight about yourself in this thread than you do about the subject at hand. You remind me of the main character in 40-year-old virgin, when the guys are all sitting around playing poker and telling sex stories. Except that in your case, you leap from your place of zero experience, knowledge or understanding and pass judgment on everyone else, where in the movie, at least the guy tried to pretend in order to HIDE his ignorance. You proudly display yours, and in fact show a bulldog's tenacity in holding onto your ignorance.

You may think this is some kind of admirable character trait. It's not. It is a severe character flaw.

You strike me as one of those reasonably-intelligent teenagers. The problem with reasonably-intelligent teenagers is they think they are geniuses who assume they know everything, won't listen to anyone, and arrogantly dismiss those who disagree with them by insulting and belittling people whose notions are at odds with your own.

Well, some day in the magical future, whenever you get a girlfriend, whenever you find that woman who will come to be your love (sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little), you won't have her for very long if you do not grow up and learn how to tell the difference between the times when you may know something, and when you don't know RICHARD.

Lastly, I know you are wrong about your blanket statements. How? As I said way back at the beginning of this: direct, personal, first-hand knowledge.

But you'll just blow it off, the same as you have blown everyone else here saying the same things.

Yes, you are to be pitied.

 

Perhaps I'm misreading, but it is hardly difficult to find a woman who is prudish in these areas.

 

That's a good question. Does it stretch things out permanently or lead to problems later? (seriously, does anyone know?) Better and more relevant to the discussion than posters attacking each other...

 

Medically speaking it can cause a lot of problems down the future, it honestly depends on the girl.

 

Once that spring is busted, I bet it is hard to fix.

 

It's significantly increases the risk of fecal incontinence due to the amount of damage it does do the sphincter and the muscles of the rectum.

I'm sure a couple times won't do much...but if it becomes a habit it probably isn't the best thing.

 

Hmm is showing shades of Rocket Analyist with his one-vs-the-world campaign (though he's kept it on-topic and mostly civil at least).

Repeated use can cause damage to the internal lining and/or the sphincter (uhhh, so I've heard). I don't think you should worry about trying it once, but save it for special occassions.

 

Maybe I missed it, but I'm still waiting to see if hmm approves of oral or not. I don't have the rule book on 'respectable love making' like he does.

 

Since you asked for it...

Even though the risk is small, anal sex can indeed lead to the loosening of the anal sphincter, a long-term effect of which can be incontinence. However, this only occurs when having anal sex "incorrectly" (yes, there is an incorrect and correct way). Jabbing anything into a contracted sphincter can potentially cause tearing; this is basically akin to "forcing it open". The tears are what lead to the loosening which eventually lead to incontinence. This is why it is important to go slowly and gently until sphincter, for lack of a better term, tires itself out and is unable to contract. This can also be achieved by having the receiver be totally relaxed so that they don't involuntarily tighten/tense up.

...so, uhhhhh yeah, there ya go...

 

considering you have yet to make a reasonable point that recognizes that other people just might not see things the way you do, you havent wasted one second of your time with me. You have yet to address me with any substance.

so, since you would be a waste of my time if it wasnt for funnay pictures, I will continue to make fun of you with said pictures...much more fun for the group.





and to keep it on-topic