I guess that's what I find annoying about both Blinebury and Solomon. They both seem to think it's the columnist's role to stir up *****, but most of the time their righteous tone rings hollow because they don't seem that invested in what they're talking about. I'd much rather read a level-headed column giving analysis and insight into how the game is played instead of this silly, half-assed rabblerousing.
Well there are 29 teams in the league, and only one team can win the championship. I guess if you rag on your team every year you're gonna be right 29/30 of the time right?
I disagree about him being right. In fact, for all his criticism, he has not offered his own action plan - what he would have done if he was the one in charge of the Rockets. I would love to see what an "intelligent" person like him has to suggest. In reality, many people who only know how to "criticise, criticise, criticise" would be among the first to fall flat on their faces and buttocks if they were actually the "men in the arena".... being an armchair GM / player is the easiest thing on the planet.
Both are bad writers. Blinebury is a bitter and unskilled writer. His comments/chats always had an abrasive and defensive tone. And his columns were full of tired cliches in which he thought he was being clever. In the end, I just couldn't get through any of his articles. Feigan is alright--just the facts without all the bluster.
you might be pathetic and live a pathetic life. but i know plenty of people here are not pathetic. before you speak about fans, please move Jerome's nads out of your way... thank you
