1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Biden's executive orders

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by ryan_98, Jan 21, 2021.

  1. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    Conservative estimates put U.S. direct subsidies to the fossil fuel industry at roughly $20 billion per year; with 20 percent currently allocated to coal and 80 percent to natural gas and crude oil.Jul 29, 2019

    So end the subsidies and put the $20 billion into unemployment, retraining and expanding jobs in renewables.
     
    Rashmon likes this.
  2. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,876
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    You can’t seriously think unemployment and retraining is an equitable substitute for well paying jobs where people are willing to work...nor that job quantities in renewables comes close to the amount in oil and gas

    not looking to argue about how you feel on fossil fuels/jobs vs green energy at all but don’t pretend that what you proposed makes actual sense from the willing workers perspective.
     
    jiggyfly and Astrodome like this.
  3. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    Do it now or do it later, the O&G is going to contract. Do it with a plan or have a slow rolling disaster. The industry has had 3 major job cutbacks in my lifetime, the boom and bust nature is systemic.
     
    rocketsjudoka likes this.
  4. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,876
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    Guess I just disagree that the “plan” of instantly working to eliminate lots of jobs while we are still reeling from so many other Americans willing to work but unable to due to the pandemic when the demand and infrastructure for fossil fuels remains unchanged is too extreme. Instead we just rely on buying from other countries as demand and need remains unchanged in the short term. Having many family and friends in the industry and living in a city where the industry is vital makes me very biased on this. So once you actually find and build the proposed green infrastructure and can make a switch, then the jobs can potentially be eliminated. Until then you are just rewarding other countries as consumption remains steady and to me that is insanely unfair. But I know many will disagree.
     
  5. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    34,907
    Likes Received:
    34,203
    From what I recall of his longer stump speech, this issue led Yang to move away from "retraining" toward UBI.
    He worked for years on a jobs training program in the midwest, if memory serves, and he described it as a failure.
     
  6. ryan_98

    ryan_98 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    711
    I know, and care, little to none about either's dating choices. The question whether Biden's executive orders will be as controversial or divisive in relation to his immediate predecessor does interest me (and has garnered 7 pages of discussion thus far). If he's attempting to be President of all Americans it is important that he have coadunate policies not alienating ones.


    Updated... no promises I'll continue this for the next 4 years. It'd be cool if forums had a collaborative post option.
     
    Xerobull likes this.
  7. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    I know, but ask the 65 year old guys, they have been through it before, probably twice where a large percentage of O&G workers were laid off.
    Somewhere around 1985 a popular bumper sticker in Houston said " Lord, please give us another oil boom, I promise we won't piss it away next time"

    The 1980s Oil Bust Almost Broke Houston. Almost
    It was brutal. Houston lost 211,000 jobs between February 1982 and March 1987. One out of eight Houstonians were unemployed because of the downturn. Tent cities became a part of the landscape. “Real estate collapsed because we had overbuilt,” says Gilmer. “All those people who’d moved down here from Michigan gave the banks the keys to their homes and moved back, because there was simply no work h
     
    #127 Dubious, Jan 28, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2021
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  8. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,155
    Likes Received:
    43,467
    I agree with Dubious. What we're seeing happening with coal should be a warning to the O&G industry. While O&G is still going to be with us for decades the technology is there already to make them obsolete as energy sources and the infrastructure for that to happen is already being built. Rather than fall behind and have to make major changes when the market for those is drying up the US should be looking to get ahead.

    There is a reason why the PRC invested so heavily the last decade in green technology. Even while they are still polluting they've already long since known that it is getting closer to the end. The US has already lost a lot of ground to the PRC and further delay will only cause the US to drop further behind.
     
  9. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,876
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    I didn’t state that oil and gas wasn’t going to go the route of coal. I stated there is zero reason this week to start with attacking the industry when demand is the same and the green technology has not been put in place. All Biden is doing right now is putting US workers out of jobs without having the infrastructure built and helping other countries. While we are USING the oil and gas, we should do so domestically as much as possible employing American workers. All these executive orders were was this new admin telling the country they plan to go big on climate. That’s fine but it isn’t necessary this week and will cost a lot of people their livelihoods prematurely. Do it when you actually have alternative energy ready
     
  10. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    55,155
    Likes Received:
    43,467
    The problem with that is unless we start sooner rather than later we won't have the alternative energy ready to provide US jobs. Not that long ago the US was the leader in manufacturing and technology for wind and solar. Now Germany and the PRC are the leaders in those.

    Transitions are never easy but the longer we wait the harder the transition will be.
     
  11. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,876
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    You aren’t understanding my point. Enjoy the evening
     
  12. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    73,232
    Likes Received:
    111,409
    can Biden executive order the Rockets to score? asking for a friend
     
  13. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,633
    Likes Received:
    6,263
    Solar is a pretty cut throat business and China owns it. I don't see how US is going to competitive in it. I guess we will import a lot of panels from China.
     
  14. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,514
    Likes Received:
    1,840
    Did you direct them to the FERC website or Lexco OWL and have them count the eleventy gillion hits that come up for approved facilities or active leases.
     
  15. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    28,558
    Likes Received:
    43,953
    People will lose jobs, it's inevitable. Some will switch to a well-paying green energy job, some will switch to other well-paying jobs, some will take lower-paying jobs, some will be flat out unemployed.

    It sucks when well-paying jobs become obsolete and lost, but it's no excuse to not do what's necessary for the people of our country, the people of this planet, and our future generations.

    It's a losing game and a bad argument, we don't for example, not attempt to stop the opioid crisis, in fear that a reduction in demand/production will lead to people losing jobs at the big drug companies.
     
    jiggyfly and FranchiseBlade like this.
  16. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,308
    Likes Received:
    3,580
    Easy to say when you aren't losing your job.
     
  17. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    48,337
    Likes Received:
    37,142
    You need a paradigm shift buddy. Removing subsidies (handouts) isn't attacking an industry. It's just letting market forces do the work for the industry without government's helping hand. It's the purest form of capitalism. Americans love capitalism. What's not to like about letting market forces handle oil and gas?
     
    rocketsjudoka likes this.
  18. CCorn

    CCorn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    21,515
    Likes Received:
    21,395
    Trust the invisible hand!!!
     
    fchowd0311 likes this.
  19. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    And it's hard to say when you are. We understand Blake's position and we empathize.
     
  20. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,876
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    I need a paradigm shift buddy? I stated that removing subsidies and putting money into retraining and having workers accept unemployment is not an even trade for good jobs. I didn’t discuss whether or not subsidies should be in place. And ironic you say let the market take care of itself while defending not letting the market take care of itself by using executive actions to stymie the US industry while demand (the market) remains stagnant. If you want clean energy, build the infrastructure first and “the market” will take care of itself as demand will wane and you don’t just buy foreign oil while the demand stays the same. These actions will put lots of people out of work when the demand stays the same. We can’t consume less fossil fuels without the actual alternative energy sources in place.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now