How do you know they won't testify? From what I understand Petraeus may very well testify Friday or next week (he has already testified once behind closed doors). Here are the letters inviting Pickering to speak at the House. So he has been invited and he decided not to show for whatever reason.
from a friend So the Beghazi controversy has evolved into GOP moles leaking falsified information to a gullible dupe in the media in order to damage a re-elected president and destroy the reputation of a former Secretary of State and frontrunner for the presidency in 2016. The press will probably stop covering it now.
Pickering has said this is not true. He was sitting next to Issa when he said it on Sunday. I'm sure you saw it.
This is completely a pre-emptive strike at Hillary and nothing more. Rest assured, they fear her potential candidacy more than they fear Obama's current presidency.
You believe the emails are fake?!?!?! what about the 12 different versions of the talking points in which all the references to AQ have been removed? Those are fake? Hick's testimony? that was fake? Good greif.....
Then it was sarcasm? It is very hard to judge sarcasm around here with all of bobmarley's and basso's posts seemingly being serious.
When ABC News Claimed It Had "Obtained" The Benghazi Emails ABC News is now claiming that its Benghazi "exclusive" was based on summaries of emails between administration aides, not the emails themselves -- an assertion belied by their earlier reports.
That's not at all what ABC is saying ABC claims they are not referring to the same email as CNN's email contains nothing from Nuland. Why would u link media matters and not ABCNews?
I suggest you wrap your head in duct tape before it explodes. The first line of ABC's "exclusive" "White House emails reviewed by ABC News" Seriously dude, you guys were duped. It's okay to admit it and move on.
