Breaking... Governor Brewer said earlier today that illegal immigrants have formed a group called "BELLOTA" and are registering to vote in droves.
And one doesn't need to make a judgment call to know that 51% is not an overwhelming majority. The american people spoke by putting the dems in charge. While 51% of those polled might not be happy with the HR Bill, out of the other half... 80% are for it and 20% are unsure. That sounds about right considering the polarized nature of our country. Back to the original topic... I can see why Governor Fuhrer and Governor QuitPalin get along so well... I prefer my women with intelligence.
What a flippin' fruitcake! She might even be as bad as Sharron Angle of Nevada. It's hard to believe these two kooks are on statewide ballots for governor and senator. Poor Arizona.
Yes, I understand that. Do I need to build you a bridge for you to see the connection? Tallanvor admits to voting straight ticket. Other posters chose to roast him for this decision when this happens all the time. Alvin Greene won the nomination because his name was first on the list. Voting straight ticket is just as useless.
A TROLL in this forum is someone who disagrees with the lefties and all of their perverted ideaologies!
No, you just need to not use terrible examples. Actually, they roasted him for voting for what he considered a lesser candidate in order to beat the Dem. They didn't roast him for the straight ticket. First, there's no actual evidence of this. But even if we accept that, it still has nothing to do with the topic. You didn't refer to Alvin Greene as a stupid vote. You specifically called Alvin Greene a "case in point" of voting straight ticket. Which was amusing, given that the Alvin Greene vote had nothing do with a straight ticket vote.
What? Unintelligent women that can't answer legitimate questions, make up stuff, and look generally lost in debates/interviews are governors? This is utterly surprising to me! Signed,
Just curious, but why is that worth "roasting" someone over? The obvious assumption is that he feels that any Democrat would be worse than the Republican he voted for, so he's voting his best interests. It's no different than a Floridian who likes Ralph Nader better than Al Gore voting for Gore in 2000.
Oh I don't know. I agree with you that there's nothing wrong with voting for the candidate with the best chance to win.
the looks of that govr and the way she talks clearly indicates she's a big liar. No Arizona for me til she exits.
My first presidential vote was for Richard Nixon in 1972. My last was for Barack Obama in 2008. Never did have good rhythm-- even for Lockstep.
I'm not sure if she got elected in the first place. She was a replacement for the former Governor who was appointed to a federal position iirc.
Even if can dig up the most unflattering picture of the Governor, she is still a trillion times better looking than your beloved First Lady!
Fixed it for you. By the way, I would take the First Lady's smarts over Palin's lack thereof any day of the week.
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/y7Op5YleM0U?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/y7Op5YleM0U?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Sry, meant has NOT been implemented yet. Apparently it is still having some effect though: http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/sb1070-has-resulted-mass-self-deportation-of-illegal-aliens-makes-critics-look-foolish
