[Basketbawful] For Some People, Winning 22 in a Row Just isn't Enough.

Blue Brick · Mar 17, 2008

From one of my fav basketball blogs, he usually takes on a more satirical view of the game. But this latest piece argues the case for the Rockets really well, I think.

Irish pub crawls in Chicago rock. Recovery from them, however, does not. So no Worst of the Weekend today. Instead, I wanted to say a few words about the Houston Rockets, whose winning streak reached 22 games with yesterday's 104-92 win over the Los Angeles Lakers.

In case you've been living under a rock and haven't heart, that's the second-longest winning streak in NBA history. Only Bill Sharman's immortal 1971-72 Los Angeles Lakers -- starring Hall-of-Famers Wilt Chamberlain, Jerry West, and Gail Goodrich -- won more games in a row. And while winning streaks, however long and impressive, don't necessarily make a champion, they do make for dramatic, must-see basketball. So I keep wondering: Why are so many people so eager and determined to dismiss The Streak?

Seriously, I've spent the past week or two defending the Rockets' winning ways from the snipings of a variety of fans and friends. The main criticisms being leveled against Houston fall into two catagories:

1. They've had an easy schedule

Frankly, it's virtually impossible in today's NBA to have 22 consecutive "easy" games, regardless of who you have to play or where you have to play them. But that's basically what a lot of people are claiming (and what people seem to claim almost any time a team goes on an extended winning streak). It's the big "but" that sneaks into every article and blog post about The Streak. Even the Associated Press recap of Number 22 had this to say: "Critics continue to dismiss Houston's streak as a fluke, saying the Rockets have played a bunch of bad teams." So, what, winning only counts if you play every game on the road against the top two or three teams in each conference?

Let's look at some facts about The Streak. Yes, Rockets have had plenty of games against sub-.500 teams, but they've also faced the Cleveland Cavaliers (twice), Dallas Mavericks, Denver Nuggets, Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers, New Orleans Hornets (twice), and Portland Trail Blazers. So even if you totally discount the rest of their games -- and you shouldn't -- it simply isn't true that they haven't played any good teams.

Now, it is true that they've played only seven road games, but three of those games were against Cleveland (22-10 at home), New Orleans (24-10), and Dallas (29-4). Of course, Dirk Nowitzki was suspended for the Rockets/Mavericks game owing to the fact that he had tried to behead Andre Kirilenko a few days prior, so the critics will probably toss that one in the trash as well. But the Rockets still hit the road and took care of business in a (small) handful of tough arenas.

As for yesterday's game against the Lakers...I must have gotten a dozen text messages immediately following the final buzzer, and most of them were a variant of "But the Lakers didn't have Pau." Fair enough. The Lakers' big man missed the game with a sprained ankle. However, if the Lakers really are the champions in waiting, shouldn't they be bigger than the loss of any one player who's not named Kobe Bryant? Let me put it this way...

I have a friend -- a die-hard Lakers fan -- who was thoroughly unimpressed with Houston's 20th win in a row, coming as it did in an ugly win over the Hawks in Atlanta. Of couse, the Lakers lost to the Hawks in a similar situation a few weeks ago. And the people who don't think much of the Rockets' opponents during The Streak should take a closer look at the "murderer's row" the Lakers faced during their recent 18-5 streak...a streak that had everybody crowning the Lakers and clamoring for Kobe to win the MVP. That streak included wins against Toronto (twice, once without Bosh), Washington (minus Caron and Agent Zero), New Jersey (as the J-Kidd situation was reaching critical mass), Orlando (and their terribly flawed backcourt), Miami (twice), Charlotte, Minnesota, Atlanta (in L.A.), Phoenix (in the Suns' first game with Shaq), the Clippers twice (no Chris Kaman or Sam Cassell), Seattle, Portland in L.A. (awful road team), Dallas at home in OT (and trying to adjust to J-Kidd), and Sacramento.

Now can anybody explain to me why that streak -- which included losses to the Pistons, Hawks, Blazers, and Kings (in L.A.) -- was considered more legit than what the Rockets have done? It's not even as though the Lakers were winning in more impressive fashion. I mean, 14 of the Rockets 22 victories have been by double figures, including 10 straight at one point. No, I'd guess it's because the Lakers have Kobe, and they have Pau, and they have a bench that many believe is the strongest and deepest in the league. Basically, it's because what the Lakers have on paper looks better than what Houston has on paper, which effectively refutes what we can see happening right before our eyes.

Here's something to consider: If the Rockets can't lose even without Yao Ming and the Lakers can't win without Pau Gasol, what does that say about each team? Or, for that matter, Kobe's claim on the MVP?

2. They can't win a title

As The Streak has grown longer and longer, this non-argument seems to be picking up steam. What does it matter if the Rockets win 22 in a row, 26 in a row, even 33 in a row? Because it's not like they can win the NBA championship, right? Not without Yao, not with Tracy McGrady's history of injuries and first round choke jobs, not with so many good Western Conference teams. No, they can't win a title, ergo all this winning is bereft of meaning and significance. Right?

Frankly, I think all that is moot. Only one team is going to win the NBA championship this season. That means there's going to be one winner and 29 losers. And last I checked, there isn't a team in the league that's so utterly flawless we should just hand them the Larry O'Brien trophy and be done with it. So what if the Rockets don't win it all? They'll be in pretty good company even if they don't. Why does that even matter?

We don't need to overanalyze and nitpick every time a team goes on a long winning streak. I say that, when a team is shining, let 'em shine. Basketball is a game. Winning is fun. I think we should congratulate the Rockets for an historic accomplishment and appreciate the fact that they've given us something worth paying attention to during what is typically one of the slowest months of the NBA season. But maybe that's just me.
Click to expand...

Bandwagoner · Mar 17, 2008

you need a link

kwng · Mar 17, 2008

Great article and solid arguments. Well, I hope we'll win it all and show them
who we are.

ShadyMcGrady · Mar 17, 2008

Yeah you need the link but it's all good I will continue to pretend there are media people out there who will write positively about the Rockets.

Lil Pun · Mar 17, 2008

I get sick of the easy schedule complaints. I mean it would be hard to beat the Memphis Grizzlies 22 straight times.

Blue Brick · Mar 17, 2008

ooops forgot the link. http://basketbawful.blogspot.com/

mic · Mar 17, 2008

Lil Pun said:

I get sick of the easy schedule complaints. I mean it would be hard to beat the Memphis Grizzlies 22 straight times.
Click to expand...

Exactly. And I like how most of the fans (of other teams) that make that argument support teams who have lost to the supposed "easy" teams we've beaten on our streak. People keep predicting that we'll lose. Newsflash: That doesn't exactly make you a genius. Of course you're going to be right eventually. Some people will always discount the Rockets. Even if we won the Championship, they'd still be naysayers. No one wants to give credit where credit is due. That's fine with me. Bring it. It just makes it all the more worthwhile when the Rockets prove them wrong, time and time again.

cujo · Mar 17, 2008

Excellent article!

ima_drummer2k · Mar 17, 2008

Lil Pun said:

I get sick of the easy schedule complaints. I mean it would be hard to beat the Memphis Grizzlies 22 straight times.
Click to expand...

It totally boggles my mind. Seriously, this is the NBA, not college football. Don't all teams in the Western Conference basically have the same schedule?

I truly don't get this argument.

And who says a team MUST have an All-Star big man to win a championship? I think the suns wouldn't have won the whole thing last year, if not for the playoff suspensions.

alexdapooh · Mar 17, 2008

Wow, I loved that article.

I read basketbawful on a daily basis... just because I find it funny because it points out and analyzes EVERYTHING negative going on in the NBA.

But... here we are... they have ONE positive article... and its about the Rockets. Awesome... just awesome

across110thstreet · Mar 17, 2008

Lakers couldn't beat Hawks, Kings, or Trailblazers.
The Rockets beat all of them, including the Lakers.

What's to discuss?

Easy · Mar 17, 2008

Here's something to consider: If the Rockets can't lose even without Yao Ming and the Lakers can't win without Pau Gasol, what does that say about each team? Or, for that matter, Kobe's claim on the MVP?
Click to expand...

^^^^
I like this quote.

DaDakota · Mar 17, 2008

Punk the naysayers cause they don't mean a thing,
this is what style we bring !

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZDw2xDDF2U&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qZDw2xDDF2U&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

DD

Chuck 4 · Mar 17, 2008

across110thstreet said:

Lakers couldn't beat Hawks, Kings, or Trailblazers.
The Rockets beat all of them, including the Lakers.

What's to discuss?
Click to expand...

Boom. There it is...

plee · Mar 17, 2008

Lil Pun said:

I get sick of the easy schedule complaints. I mean it would be hard to beat the Memphis Grizzlies 22 straight times.
Click to expand...

Heck 7 out of 10 would be acceptable (.700)

Yao4REAL · Mar 17, 2008

I think the REAL reason people don't give Houston's FULL credit is the absent of Yao. They want to see a dominant team getting those streaks and automatic discredit those that aren't. If this streak include Yao in the game, they would be more than impress...in fact they will automatic label Houston as the team to BEAT for the Championship. Even though i am fan, i tend to agree...it is true that this streak is bitter sweet. On the one hand, you go...oh that's freaking awesome but on the other, you know they are not going anywhere in the Playoffs and opponents knows it too. When i said "not going anywhere," i meant not contending for the Championship....so even if they advance pass the first round or 2nd round, it it not enough and will be defeated...so in a sense it is bitter sweet. I do not believe in moral victories and passing the first round is not consider success until you're favor to win the Championship. And this is bitter sweet because everyone knows that with Yao in the team, they're favor to win it all.

Water Boy · Mar 17, 2008

Very insightful article with solid arguments.

tinman · Mar 17, 2008

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!

you newer Rocket fans are just having a small taste of what hate the 90s Rockets 'used to get...And that team won 2 championships!

Lakers-well the didn't have Gasol ....

early 90s Rockets- well, Jordan wasn't in shape when they lost to the Magic..

but but but but but but but
what if what if what if what if

I want you to absorb all this hate and some of you newbs will learn what it is to be a Rockets fan

but Dirk didn't play
but Jordan didn't..

What goes around comes around!

JuanValdez · Mar 17, 2008

Beating the Lakers, we also now have a new counter-argument: no other team in the western conference has beat as many teams as the Rockets have all season, period. Even if the schedule during the streak was a little soft, our schedule since the beginning of the season was not soft and we still have a better record than everyone else.

bbjai · Mar 17, 2008

I think we should post this article for all the Lakers Homers out there so they can come up with pathetic excuses to defend the Fakers

Forums

[Basketbawful] For Some People, Winning 22 in a Row Just isn't Enough.

Blue Brick Member

Bandwagoner Member

kwng Member

ShadyMcGrady Member

Lil Pun Member

Blue Brick Member

mic Member

cujo Member

ima_drummer2k Member

alexdapooh Member

across110thstreet Member

Easy Boban Only Fan
Supporting Member

DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!
Supporting Member

Chuck 4 Member

plee Member

Yao4REAL Member

Water Boy Member

tinman Member
Supporting Member

JuanValdez Member

bbjai Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!

[Basketbawful] For Some People, Winning 22 in a Row Just isn't Enough.

Blue Brick Member

Bandwagoner Member

kwng Member

ShadyMcGrady Member

Lil Pun Member

Blue Brick Member

mic Member

cujo Member

ima_drummer2k Member

alexdapooh Member

across110thstreet Member

Easy Boban Only Fan Supporting Member

DaDakota If you want to know, just ask! Supporting Member

Chuck 4 Member

plee Member

Yao4REAL Member

Water Boy Member

tinman Member Supporting Member

JuanValdez Member

bbjai Member

Share This Page

Easy Boban Only Fan
Supporting Member

DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!
Supporting Member

tinman Member
Supporting Member