For those of you who don't know, basketball prospectus is a NBA site focused on advanced statistics in breaking down the NBA. Morey even wrote a foreward to their inaugural basketball prospectus. So I bought it this year, and I was stunned to see that their "SCHOENE" projection for the Rockets is 36-46, 13th best in the west. Now I am all for the use of statistics in every sport, but how in the hell can anyone think we will be worse than last year? Here is the season preview: To borrow a line from former NFL coach Denny Green, the 2009-10 Houston Rockets both were and were not who we thought they were. The expectation that the Rockets would take a significant step back proved correct, as Houston sunk into the lottery without injured star center Yao Ming. Yet it wasn’t for lack of scoring, as was feared, that the Rockets struggled. Instead, their issues cropped up at the other end of the floor, shedding new light on Yao’s value as a defender. The 2009 postseason run, which saw Houston get out of the first round for the first time since 1997, came at a heavy price. During Game Three of a competitive seven-game series against the Lakers, Yao suffered a hairline fracture of the tarsal navicular bone of his left foot. With the bone healing slowly, Yao underwent surgery in July to reduce pressure on the injured area. Subsequently, he was ruled out for the entire 2009-10 season. Yao joined teammate Tracy McGrady (recovering from February 2009 microfracture surgery) on the most expensive inactive list in NBA history. Without their two stars, the Rockets faced the difficult question of where to find scoring from a group of players previously expected to play supporting roles. Most of the preseason analysis about Houston, including the team essay in last year’s Pro Basketball Prospectus, focused on this thorny issue. The Rockets lost more of their possession creation than any other team in the NBA. The upside for Houston was that neither McGrady nor Ron Artest (who left as a free agent) was an efficient option. After all, the Rockets were just a middleof- the-pack offensive team at full strength; this wasn’t exactly equivalent to the Cleveland Cavaliers trying to replace LeBron James. The situation played out largely as SCHOENE projected. Several players, including Trevor Ariza, Aaron Brooks and Luis Scola, stepped into larger roles. Their efficiency declined from where it had been, but they had enough room to drop off and still be just as effective overall as the Yao-McGrady-Artest core. In the end, Houston went from 16th in the league in Offensive Rating in 2008-09 to 18th in 2009-10. The Rockets’ real issues were at the defensive end of the floor, which speaks well to Yao’s defense. At 7’6”, Yao’s limitations are easy to see. Like other behemoths, he has a tough time when asked to defend on the perimeter or step out against the pick-and-roll. Still, Yao has made strides in these regards since entering the league (no less an authority than Tom Thibodeau, an assistant in Houston under Jeff Van Gundy before going to Boston, has praised his improvement) and it’s impossible to duplicate his size in the paint. Exacerbating the issue was the Rockets’ lack of size behind Yao. 6’6” Chuck Hayes replaced him in the starting lineup, becoming the shortest starting center in NBA history according to the Elias Sports Bureau via Fanhouse.com. Hayes is a phenomenal post defender capable of stonewalling far bigger players, but ROCKETS IN A BOX Last year’s record 42-40 Last year’s Offensive Rating 108.9 (18) Last year’s Defensive Rating 109.9 (17) Last year’s point differential -0.4 (16) Team pace 92.7 (6) SCHOENE projection 36-46 (13) Projected Offensive Rating 109.9 ( 19) Projected Defensive Rating 111.8 (25) Projected team weighted age 28.6 (10) Projected ’10-11 payroll $72.3 ( 8) Est. payroll obligations, ’11-12 $43.4 ( 27) Head coach: Rick Adelman Last season was just the third time in Adelman’s 19 years as a head coach that his team missed the postseason, and the first non-playoff season he’s ever had outside of Golden State (where his coaching wasn’t nearly good enough to make up for years of ineptitude). Adelman’s steady approach doesn’t resonate with fans who want more fire from their coaches, and his record once in the playoffs is mixed at best. Still, it’s hard to argue with the success he’s enjoyed at multiple stops. He is two strong seasons or three average ones away from joining the 1,000-win club. 98 HOUSTON ROCKETS his help defense is limited to taking charges. Houston’s other options were even worse. David Andersen, brought over from Europe to back up the middle, was a disappointment. The tallest player on the roster, Andersen was soft defensively. Rockets coach Rick Adelman was forced to use 6’9” Luis Scola, a power forward by trade, in the middle much of the time. Houston opponents went from making 46.5 percent of their two-point attempts in 2008-09, the league’s fifth-lowest mark, to hitting them at a cool 50.3 percent clip in 2009-10, eighth-highest in the NBA. The Rockets’ Defensive Rating skyrocketed along with the shooting percentages, falling all the way from fourth in the league to 17th. Houston actually got off to an impressive start to the season, playing above-.500 basketball despite a torturous slate of early games. The expectation, at least at Rockets HQ, was that the team would take off as soon as the schedule evened out. That never came to pass; after peaking at 24-18, Houston lost 11 of its next 16 games to slip back to even and never again got more than four games over .500. In a Western Conference where 50 wins were needed to make the postseason, the Rockets were not nearly good enough. By the trade deadline, Houston was already starting to look ahead to 2010-11. The Rockets owned one of the league’s most valuable chips in McGrady’s enormous expiring contract. Ahead of schedule in his rehab, McGrady had briefly rejoined the team in December, but it quickly became clear he did not figure into Houston’s plans for either the short or long term. He went back to Chicago to continue his rehab under the guidance of trainer Tim Grover while Daryl Morey sought to turn his contract into useful assets. Desperate to shed salary and clear space for the summer of 2010, the New York Knicks emerged as the most obvious suitor. Morey refused to budge on his offer to Knicks president of basketball operations Donnie Walsh. He’d take back the final season of Jared Jeffries’ contract, but only if New York gave up its 2009 lottery pick (forward Jordan Hill), the right to swap first-round picks in 2011 and its 2012 first-round pick (protected only through the top five picks). The price was steep, but on the morning of the deadline Walsh agreed to the deal. In the interim, Morey had already worked out a related deal with the Sacramento Kings. The Rockets sent forward Carl Landry, enjoying a breakout season in a sixth-man role, to Sacramento in exchange for shooting guard Kevin Martin. Filler was included on both sides as part of the eventual three-way trade. The move was a bold one for Houston, sending out a proven performer with a bargain contract. In return, the Rockets got the efficient scorer they had coveted at the two-guard to replace the inefficient McGrady. Having made the trade and sacrificed cap space, Houston was not a player in free agency. The Rockets hoped to get in on the bidding for free agent Chris Bosh via a sign-and-trade deal and had the assets to make a compelling offer to Toronto, but Bosh showed only cursory interest. Instead, the Rockets focused on bringing back their own restricted free agents, Scola and backup guard Kyle Lowry. They matched a fouryear, $23.5 million offer sheet from the Cavaliers to Lowry and came to terms with Scola on a deal that guarantees him $30 million over the next four years (a fifth year can become guaranteed depending on performance clauses, per ShamSports.com). With the mid-level exception to spend, Houston went shopping for a big man to provide insurance for Yao and settled on former Chicago center Brad Miller, who will be a strong backup if Yao is healthy and is capable of stepping into the starting lineup and providing size and skill if not. Miller was expensive on a per-year basis (about $4.5 million annually), but the Rockets limited their exposure by guaranteeing only $800,000 of the third and final season, again per ShamSports. The Martin trade also had an impact on Houston’s offseason trade. Getting Martin created a logjam at small forward, where the Rockets had not only two starting-caliber players in Ariza and Shane Battier but also Chase Budinger, who was effective as a rookie. Houston solved it by dealing Ariza to New Orleans in a four-team trade that brought back third-year shooting guard Courtney Lee. Lee is a better fit as a backup to Martin. More importantly his rookie contract is much cap-friendlier than Ariza’s deal, which had four years and $28 million left to go. The team also created a $6.3 million trade exception that Morey can put to use. Because the Rockets are in luxury-tax territory, they saved nearly $10 million by swapping Ariza for Lee, having already cut their bill by paying Toronto to take Andersen off their hands. Despite the moves, the team still has enviable depth. Houston’s third unit includes Hill, Jeffries and rookie Patrick Patterson, while the second group is stocked with solid young contributors. Lowry might be the best backup point guard in the league. HOUSTON ROCKETS 99 Still, a surplus of capable contributors won’t be enough for the Rockets if they’re lacking in star power. That’s where Yao comes in, and as the season approaches it is not entirely clear whether he’ll be back on the court for the start of training camp. Houston can’t count on a full season from Yao, and his minutes will be limited to no more than 24 in any game all season long to preserve his health. There’s also the question of just how effective Yao will be after missing a full season, and even if he had been entirely healthy, he’s at an age (30) where he might be showing the early signs of decline. Comparable players, per SCHOENE, saw their per-minute production decline by 6.0 percent at the same age. Those caveats help explain a projection that is surprising in its pessimism. Could the Rockets actually be worse in 2010-11 despite Yao’s return and a full season with Martin? In particular, SCHOENE sees Houston failing to improve on defense. The Rockets’ projected shot blocking is even worse than it was a year ago because Yao is the team’s only consistent shot-blocking threat. A starting frontcourt of Miller and Scola might be the league’s worst in terms of blocking shots, since Miller is a weaker shot blocker than Hayes despite his superior height. A full season from Yao would help Houston beat its defensive projection. There’s also the fact that the Rockets outplayed their point differential a year ago, winning nearly two more games than expected. An apparent offensive decline is really just an issue of how the teams are distributed. SCHOENE projects Houston to be right at league average in terms of per-possession offense, with several other teams bunched in the same area. That’s better than the Rockets was a year ago, though not dramatically so. Houston stands an excellent chance of outplaying their projection if things break right, though the downside risk is also worth mentioning. As with Yao, Martin is also prone to injury--he’s missed at least 21 games each of the last three seasons, making him a fitting replacement for McGrady. If those two players go down, the Rockets are left with more or less the same group as last year. Houston has proven it can be competitive without its stars, but will need them healthy to really make some noise. Kevin Pelton
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1453868992/baseballprospect/ref=nosim/ I think he copied it from the ebook. Its not available for free online.
Hogwash. There is no way this team is worse both offensively and defensively than they were last year. It's amazing how many things an article that long completely failed to consider.
its an interesting projection, and entirely plausible. no way to get a gauge for this team until we really see them play together without hurting themselves.
Explanation of the projection system (SCHOENE) is here: http://www.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=1206
This is why advanced stats are way flawed, they are an interesting way to help figure things out but they are incomplete information and as thus are not an accurate determiner of actual results. DD
Looks like it is still a system based on the 13 standard statistical measures. It takes into account usage and possessions, which is a step forward, but would still undervalue qualities that do not show up on the standard boxscore. Hockey pass, deflections, and.. defense in general. Makes sense that a team like the Rockets would be underrated by this system since a big part of our evaluation process is the attempt to fairly value those "intangibles".