Authorities Swarm Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch

Robin Williams

 

Los Olivos is 10 miles from where I Live. b*stard scum media around. A 12 year old boy has claimed Michael Jackson molested him.

 

How are Michael Jackson and K-mart similar?????













Little boys pants half-off.

 

He wont get caught, he's a smooth criminal.

 

hahaha hes a freak thats what he is

 

What's the difference between Michael Jackson and a plastic bag?

One's made of plastic, and is dangerous to children, and the other is used to carry groceries.

 

Isn't Michael Jackson in Vegas right now.....doing a video remake of that Elton John classic: don't let your son go down on me.

 

twenty investigators seems a bit much.

 

This is turning into a real "Thriller"

 

Man, this is just pathetic...I can't believe this a-hole can continue to do something like this...

I didn't know he paid the other kid that accused him 10 years ago about $24MM...

Sick f$cker...

 

Seventy Law enforcement officials.

 

That's what some attorney was saying this morning on GMA.

I don't think so though. To me, it's simple mathmatics. Search's are usually carried out by a team....at the very least, there would be two investigators. Still, the average size home is just a couple of thousand square feet.

But this Neverland Ranch is HUGE. Besides the mansion, it's got an amusement park, a theater, "entertainment" facilities, barns, a zoo, and other various and sundry structures. The place sits on 4,000 acres! To me, twenty investigators seems a bit small to tackle such a huge project.

 

Yeah, you're probably right, I was thinking there wasn't much to search for, but I guess they are looking for anything, ie tapes, magazines, pictures, etc. to prove he's a pedophile.

 

What happens if the glove doesn't fit?

 

What I don't understand is WHY the Hell Parents would let their Children go over to Michael Jacksons house to sleep over?!?!?!


WTF. Even if he has never touched a child before, he's a strange 45 year old pop star that has been accused of Child Endangerment and has had a stigma of child molestation for years. I personally think any parents that would let a child go to Mike's house to spend the night simply want some of his cash.

Either they are complete morons or they are greedy bastards willing to use their children to get paid. What kind of freaking parents would let their child, a TWELVE year old child stay at that freaks house. He recently admitted sleeping with them and tucking them in '' very nicely ".

Sure Jacko may have done something in the past and may be touching children, but when he's interviewed in the past you hear some pain in his voice about his childhood and the innocence etc. Maybe he feels he was exploited in his youth and lost his youth and lives vicariously through these kids. I mean he used to hang with Webster, the Home Alone Kid and many other famous kids. Maybe he realized that everyone he knows or considers a friend is just after his money and the only people who will be real to him are children.

I don't know the answer to any of this, but regardless, if something did happen then the parents are just as guilty as Michael Jackson for letting their 12-year old son spend the night at Jacko's. And i'm sure there will conveniently be a civil trial or a settlement with a nice fat paycheck for the parents. And it only cost their son a few nights a Jacko's in which something may or may not have happened.

 

It seems to me, that if Michael Jackson was smart, he'd have a drcuroty camera installed in each room. Then it would be a done deal. No problems. Just review the tape.

 

He has got to be a freak, the name of his freagin' place is the Neverland Ranch.

 

Nah, if the tape showed nothing, there would always be the assumption that it was doctored. If it showed something or was "missing", he'd have provided evidence of his guilt.

As it is, MJ's a freaky perv who needs serious help. It's too bad he turned into such a sideshow, he was one of the greatest solo artists ever back in the day.

 

What you say about the tape makes some sense, but if the tape was Doctored that would be easy to determine. I think the jury could come to a factual conclusion on that. If it was missing you could presume some degree of guilt, but an innocent person wouldn't have to worry about that, because the tape would be there.