1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Atlantic] ...someone in this generation will be the last human to eat a bluefin tuna

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Ottomaton, Nov 14, 2009.

  1. Shovel Face

    Shovel Face Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    44
    Agreed. Communists don't eat tuna. We should have learned our lesson when capitalism killed off the Woolly Mammoth.
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    I don't really know how to feel about this.

    I guess it just comes down to whether you feel that our actions are part of the natural order or not.
     
  3. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,192
    Likes Received:
    15,350
    In the comments of the story on the Atlantic's site is the following:

    [rquoter]
    The background species extinction rate is somewhere between 10 and 100 species per year, but the current rate is around 27,000 per year.

    [/rquoter]


    Like with anthropogenic global warming, some delta CO<sub>2</sub> is normal. Extremely rapid CO<sub>2</sub> change isn't. Some species extinction is normal. The current rate is more in line with Chicxulub.
     
  4. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,785
    Likes Received:
    41,212
    I'm a little surprised at some of the reactions (and the lack of reaction) to losing what I consider a major species in our oceans. Whether we care to be concerned about it, or not, there is a balance in the ocean environment that has taken millions of years to come about. That we can so disrupt and damage it in a relatively short time is not only a bummer, but may come back to bite us, big time.
     
  5. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,047
    You need better reading comprehension. Capitalism isn't the cause for all extinctions. In this case it is.

    You're not going to get fishers to stop fishing bluefin when its rarity is a big reason why it expensive and heavily sought after.
     
  6. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    repped for truth.

    The environment is ****ed.
     
  7. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    Perhaps many of us here just have lost all hope for humanity. I strongly believe that we're going to destroy the world and ourselves in the process. It's a lock.
     
  8. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    That is interesting, but my question was more about whether or not you count human activity as natural or not... no matter how destructive or helpful it may be.

    I'm guessing you consider it not to count it as part of nature, etc.

    Which is fine.
     
  9. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    There is no "natural" check on human overpopulation thanks to technology. Sure, eventually the environment will cascade from "frail" to "imminent mass starvation and worldwide cataclysm" but that's hardly natural. If wolves overpopulate, they die off until the deer rebound.
     
  10. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    Are you sure about that? I don't think I want to find out :(
     
  11. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    If you read a bit further in that post, there is definitely a "check" on humanity.
     
  12. ScriboErgoSum

    ScriboErgoSum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Messages:
    3,149
    Likes Received:
    387
    Granted, my wife is a chef, and I have a lot of chef friends. That being said, it bothers me that sustainable fishing and farming is joked about so cavalierly. There are plenty of seafood species that can be eaten without worry about the entire species becoming extinct or reaching the brink where commercial fishing is endangered. Bluefin tuna is in the same category as shark fins and chilean sea bass. Some kid about them tasting great, but your kids will never know that.

    It's the same attitude with sustainable farming. Particularly in America with farm subsidies, we practically make farmers grow food that does not benefit their soil, making future crops more difficult. Don't even get me started on the corn industry.

    Luckily there are a growing number of restaurants that will only sell sustainable foods. It's not nearly enough to stop the extinction of several species, but it's a start. Hopefully that trend will continue, and local, sustainable farming will become a lot more popular.

    However, my company's holiday party is at Landry's, and I noticed that Chilean sea bass is a seafood choice. We're not going to have it as an option, but management at my company had no idea that it was an endangered fish. I'm going to give the people at Landry's a lecture after the party.
     
  13. rhino17

    rhino17 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    18,025
    Likes Received:
    4,436
    Definitely a good question. I personally see man as part of nature and thus their actions as natural. I've never understood the "that's not natural" argument for any reason. IMO, all things are natural.
     
  14. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,192
    Likes Received:
    15,350
    The prodigiousness of the destruction relative to the background rate of creation of new species to replace them necessarily qualifies it as an unnatural or an aberrant state.
     
  15. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    I respectfully disagree.

    But I totally understand that line of reasoning.

    I would say when something is done, be it harmful or helpful, that is not done toward the goal of survival, then it could be counted as unnatural.

    Maybe it is fair to count something as unnatural if it is done toward the goal of luxury/gluttony?
     
  16. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    Does that mean that humans with motorboats and longlines is part of the natural order?
     
  17. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    Chilean sea bass should really go back to being called Patagonian Tooth Fish.
     
  18. rhino17

    rhino17 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    18,025
    Likes Received:
    4,436
    Explain to me why it is not
     
  19. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,898
    Likes Received:
    39,877
    I can't wait until my wife can't make Tuna Salad anymore. The more things that mayonnaise is used for that disappear the better!
     

Share This Page