Are the Rockets better without Chris Paul?

There was a time when thread starting privileges were revoked...

 

Ban worthy?

 

@KingCheetah replaces the Elf on the Shelf with a troll just in time for New Year's.

We appreciate you.

 

Interior defense....... wtf is that?

 

...

 

This thread deserves this:

 

I think you mean "April Fools!"

 

Go to bed. Get off the sauce.

 

Doesnt matter cause if you see by today match up, im assuming the nba thinks these are key playoff games. With Houston taking on thunder in first round with maybe them having homecourt. And if the rockets get passed them its obviously a 7 games series with Lakers, where Lakers beat us with Lebron playing miracle ball like he did Raptors. Then he plays hero ball and wins a championship first year in the west. yep mark my words, its all paid for by nba exes ,drinks and shoe sales .lol Aint even about basketball anymore, its what sales, and lebron aint gonna get beat by houston or the warriors, thats bad marketing.

 

Nicely done

 

umm we've seen this team without cp3. my how quickly people forget how low the ceiling is. easily no

one things for sure though. houston is way better without melo

 

No.

 

The rockets have a higher win percentage with Austin rivers than cp3

 

Have a nice Dream!

 

Terribly stupid question..

CP3 brings so much to the table, even when he’s not scoring well, the guy is the only player outside Lebron who can control the flow of the game. He knows how to exploit any mismatch and weakness, the dude is a true floor general. Unfortunately, he’s getting old and injury prone.

 

Its disheartening to see so many serious responses in here. Noted for future reference.

 

If he takes minutes from Austin Rivers then yes

 

Exactly. Some fools in here.

Do you guys know what tongue-in-cheek means?