Are BigTexx and TJ for real?

Unlikely

 

So by basso’s twisted logic we can infer that that past 40 years republicans have condoned the likes of Robertson, Dobson, Hagee and other radical, white christians that have called for the murder of Supreme Court justices, abortion doctors and homosexuals. Not to mention that republicans have given the wink and nod to such reasonable people like his fantasy, Anne Coulter (that’s called for the assassination of democratic presidents) or Rush Limbaugh calling our service members phony soldiers or labeling torture fraternity pranks

 

how is that contradictory?

edit: when he says united states of white america, he isn't saying the united states is white, he's saying white people in the us see things differently and separating. is it devisive and negative, yes? is it racist, no and not even what I wrote.

 

Almost as funny as you not being able to distinguish between the ones that Obama called bitter, and all rural America.

I think it's great that you keep coming back here as often as you are shown to be wrong.

 

t.j. is the main person in this forum who talks about black people in america. so I guess he thinks he is a racist. how often does he refer to black americans defending o.j. he separates people all the time.

 

Priceless. This is post of the year material.

 

You were the one that made the claim that it was only 20 minutes. You bear the burden of proof. Hustle up and get me that data, boy. If you can't see the problem with attending this man's church and hearing his sermons for 20 years, then you are willfully ignoring reality. You're good at that.

 

Don't insult Colbert with the comparisons.

I personally think AllHatNoCattle is for most part sincere. I don’t agree with 95% of his views nor myself would choose his style to engage others, but I do think he is authentic.

Trader-Junior, I think less so, at least in front of a keyboard. There is so little independent thought, the posts are like strait from the DodoHead manual and like Rush L, I don’t think he makes any effort at all to be intellectually consistent, it is all about being partisan.

My 2 cents.

 

Was the "boy" really necessary? I'm confused on what the problem is really.

 

So does the mere existence of this thread confirm that bigtexxx and Trader_Jorge are the stars of the D&D?

 

Except that I've quoted links that back up what I've said.

Here's another link to one of the sermons that has nothing in it like what's caused the uproar.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/for-the-record.html

Here's the link I've provided before with people who are much more familiar with the church than you are.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88552254

Now that I've provided even more evidence to back up my claim. I'm still waiting on you to do the same.


Chop Chop Princess, get the data to back up your claim, or let it be shown to be yet another baseless fallacy posted by you.
TIA

 

if "for real" means honest, then no.

 

I find it interesting that a thread about the reality of two most avowedly rightwing posters has turned into a defense of Obama.

As for whether they are real or not I have no idea. I hope Bigtexxx is real since I've finally gotten mentioned in another poster's sig.

 

Is Carrotop a star? Gilbert Gottfried? To some, yes.

 

I thought that was just run of the mill.

 

We didn't need a thread to confirm that.

 

it is funny that they actually are twin brothers. If they are for real (which I seriously doubt), those parents must be something else.

 

Anecdotal evidence is the weakest kind. You have not met my burden of proof and I maintain my position.

 

Actually zero proof is weaker than anecdotal. I have provided several instances of anecdotal, while you have provided zero.

Maintain whatever you would like, but your showing nothing to back your claim has been entered into evidence, and the jury is ready to deliver an unfavorable verdict your direction.

 

Real or not, they're pretty hilarious.