[AP]Circumcision reduces HIV risk by up to 60 percent

Well, unless you marry someone with HIV.

 

I guess I should have said both partners.

 

If it starts to bleed you must believe!

 

Heart of every parent.

We can hold our own pain, but when we see our kids, especially babies to supper, it is gut wrenching.

You just have to tell yourself, this is for the better of its health.

But then again, always watch out unsafe practice by the docs and nurses. There are lots of irresponsible ones out there. I dont have blind faith in them.

 

Who didn't get it from a blood transfusion...

 

I hear you man. Let's just go for theory, not reality.

 

well we do a lot of "unnatural" stuff for health reasons.

 

and how common are those kind of sexual relationships in the history of humanity?

 

I want to have one done tomorrow. Where do I find the places? Do I look them up under circumcision in the yellow pages?

 

Just get a handjob from Edward Scissorhands instead.

 

glad to be uncircumcised, gotta have protection for my head when its in sleepin mode

 

i admire your dedication to this thread, derek. 7 posts and counting...

 

I don't know how many kids will go up to their parents and say "Okay I've made a decision..."

I wonder how bad it would hurt to get it done when you're older and knowing what you're doing.

 

It's ignorance like that which causes diseases like AIDS, other STDs and teenage pregnancy to be so rampant.

That's cool if you go that route but don't push that as advice to young people. It just isn't natural and doesn't work.

Using condoms reduces your risk by 100%

 

Ignorance is bliss. Be a slut pay the price.

 

I'm not pushing it on anyone, nor have I practiced what I preached. I am simply pointing out that you can greatly decrease your odds of HIV/ AIDS by your actions. If I mess around with a bunch of mexican hookers in Guadalajara than there is a good shot I am going to bring home a bonus treat. But if I am a little more judicious with my partners than I have less to worry about. Foreskin or no foreskin. That is the obvious fallacy of the study in the OP.

 

Hey, I have such a great idea. Why don't we just take the operation further and cut their whole ****ing dicks off? Bam! no sex no HIV.

problem f'n solved man.

 

Circumcision is not necessarily mdeicaly benefical, which is true. But, having it done within the 24 hour of birth is the best practice if it needs to be done.
Lot of things are not natural, and we call it nurture, and that's what care giver is there for. There is no real bad thing about circumsion, and potential bad if not circumcised, so why not have it done? It's really a cosmetical surgery.

 

ignorant and strawman.

 

Maybe its just too revolutionary for your uber-ignorant mind to handle.


Hatuhz goin' hate.