I think the starting should be: QB RB RB WR WR WR TE K Def. 8 bench spots for any position. Is there something I'm missing that makes this impossible?
Is there an option on Yahoo for WR/RB? If we had more people, I'd agree, but with this little, it makes the draft a little more interesting, IMO.
I swear to god. If you treat this as flippantly as the baseball league, Im going to send my fiancee over to kick you in the shins.
I don't. I take my fantasy football seriously. Serious (someone screwed me in a proposed trade once...haven't played with them since). But I do like a good kick to the shins occasionally. Good for the soul.
Ok, so go ahead and set the league to 12 or 14? Or leave it like it is? And the lineup, it should be this.. QB RB RB WR WR WR TE K Def. 8 bench spots. But isn't it better to have 2 kickers and 2 DEFs so if one has a bye, we can play the other? Whaddya guys think?
I'm not understanding why you can't pick 2 defenses and put one on your bench to use for a bye week. I've never played in a league where you can't do that.
If you want to see the league now, I have it setup where it is just one K and one DEF. Now there is no other spot underneath them to bench them. They have their own sections. The offense (QB, RB...) has their own bench, but just for them. That's why I asked for 2 Ks and 2 DEFs.
So does everyone agree w/ the lineup list? Let me know if that's ok. Also, does anyone want to extend the teams to 12 or 14?
I'd say 10 or 12. I'd also suggest one less TE on the lineups just because most of the nfl tightends have very poor stats and if we have 12 teams that means we collectivly have to find 24 good TE's + reserves for bye weeks. Sounds tough since I can name about 5 decent TE's league wide.
10 is fine. I think you guys are intending the same thing but confused over semantics. Whatever the wording is, as long as you start one K, D, but have one for bye weeks is fine for me.
