nope. They aim NOT for personnel defensive bombing with the aim as cover in confronting the enemy. They aim for the max. carnage to innocent women and child. The distinction is clear. But unfortunately Hezbollah supporters can't see it...
It is blatant excuse making. They agreed to a cease-fire and then 24 hours later were dropping bombs, because a non-specific area was a threat? Under that criteria all of Lebanon was open target and the Israelis were dishonest for agreeing to a cease fire. After what they have done, all of Lebanon was a 'threat' to them.
You know what? Even Israelis themselves dropped pamphlets in Beiruit warning about retaliation on the civilian target.
for the love of god, is your perspective really this one sided? israel is doing EXACTLY what you are saying.
Warnings are noble to civilians and a method of conventional warfare, very true...Gorilla warfare with the attachment of terrorism/Islamic facism will do more harm than good to the innocent people of Lebanon. You can't have one foot in democracy and the other in Islamic Facist based terrorism...That is a problem!... One or the other Lebanon...unfortunately, I feel the choice was already made a long time ago despite what the opposing viewpoints say about that...
they do drop leaflets to warn the civilians to leave, but the problem is that they have bombed out all the bridges and roads to get out of town. than israeli planes attack civilain convoys who are only doing what the israelis told them to do in the first place, which is leave. its really pretty sick.
I don't know how noble that causing “destruction, displacement and death" and then using it as warning is. To you, it is noble. The leaflet warned that Israel could return “with all necessary might.”
