1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Another Clinton basher goes down in flames...

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by underoverup, Apr 24, 2003.

  1. underoverup

    underoverup Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,208
    Likes Received:
    75
    Honestly you think the nation should have been taken through all that nonsense in the first place? Tell me will we be seeing anymore independent counsels after the never ending white water saga? I think the reason for that is clear. The subject has obviously shifted in this thread away from a important Republican who called for Clinton's removal, who was in fact doing something much more disgusting. Does he represent the entire Republican party absolutely not. Does he deserve to have his name and reputation destroyed absolutely YES.
     
  2. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    oddly enough, it was republicans who argued against the concept of an independent counsel to begin with! it was a creation after Watergate. it's a bad idea..i totally agree with you. but it was the law of the land at the time.

    does this guy deserve to be shamed...absolutely. but i am always amazed at how many people will say, "clinton was impeached for getting a blow job." couldn't be further from the truth and completely makes light of the seriousness of lying under oath in court proceedings. do i think he should have been held accountable??? you bet your ass i do...as should anyone else who lies under oath. there has to be penalty for that or people will never take the courts seriously.

    clinton has no one to blame but himself for "taking the nation through that." he lied under oath...then he came before all of us and wagged his finger at us saying, "i did not have relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky."
     
  3. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    Nope. No more than the nation should've been put through all the October Surprise crap, or the Bork hearings, or the Thomas hearings, etc.
     
  4. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    IIRC, a Republican governor of Arkansas could not get the folks to vote the way he wanted on this, so he replaced some of them with Republican faithful, and had a revote on the disbarment...
     
  5. johnheath

    johnheath Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    hhmmmm, so, standing Presidents are immune from the law?
     
  6. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    There is a precedent for preventing nuisance civil suits until AFTER the term of office is up. Look it up. The *Republican* Renquist decided this wasn't a nuisance suit and let it go to SCOTUS.

    edit
    some references in this article...
    http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/jones529/
     
    #46 Woofer, Apr 25, 2003
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2003
  7. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    William Bennett ... .. ... .. ... :p
     
  8. dn1282

    dn1282 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2000
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    0
    a lot of these guys that are getting scrutinized for being with girls under 18 need to move to New Zealand or something...they're trying to lower the legal age limit for girls to have sex to 14 :eek: And I thought Europeans were freaky.
     

Share This Page