Ann Coulter defends Gannon and uses bigotted language..

that's all she said? what is the big deal?

 

Boo!

Don't touch your monitor, RMTex just crapped his pants....

 

Really? Then tell us why it isn't a big deal. I think it'll be fun watching you try and explain how it was an innocent and harmless thing.

 

I read somebody refer to her as a "coke snake". Now, I don't know what that IS, but it describes Ann Coulter perfectly.

 

Not quite Giddy, but then again, I'm not at the "Depends Undergarment" stage of life that you are!

 

If she said "press passes cant be hard to come by if that old towel head camel jockey Helen Thomas is sitting within yards of the prez", then I could see how it is bad.

since when is calling someone an arab derrogatory?

was that as fun as you had hoped?

 

ha!

i wasn't offended at all by her comments either, but then again i am not easily offended. in fact, i'd go as far as to say the conversations i have with my friends would offend a whole-hell-of-alot-of people. we have a sick sense of humor.

but ann coulter is a f*cking loon, and Fox constantly giving her spots on their shows clearly demonstrates their "objectivity," or lack thereof.

 

No diapers, jumpsuits or Viagra for me!

 

Since she was using the term to try to illustrate that HT shouldn't have a press pass. She was saying that if an Arab can get a press pass, then anyone can. She was equating the word "Arab" with the word "terrorist," and that is wrong.

 

Well that is one interpretation isn't it!?!

She was just cracking on one of Bush's oldest, harshest critics in my estimation.

Do you really think she was calling for the banishment of HT?

 

She was saying that Helen Freaking Thomas, a journalist with a long, distinguished, proven track record was on the same (or lower) level as Gannon, a part time hack whose "publication" was did not even exist before he started receiving press credentials.

And she did it by implying that all Arabs, HT included, were a security risk.

And you are defending her. Nice.

 

She was joking for God's sake... and it's Helen Freak Thomas!

It may be boorish, but it's not a pollicy proposal.

 

In that case, how does George Warmonger Bush sound?

It was boorish and thank God that she doesn't have the power to make policy proposals.

However, she actually tried to use Helen Thomas as an example of people that shouldn't be allowed within "yards" of the president when referencing Gannon, for Christ's sake. Thomas may be a lot of things to you, but nobody can deny that she is a well credentialed professional journalist whereas Gannon seems to have been allowed into WH press briefings as a plant to lob softball questions on national TV.

And you are defending the witch for what she said. I guess I wouldn't be surprised if it were t_j or texx, but it really surprises me that you are so far gone.

 

Yes and yes. All the overly sensitive out there can now feel free to commence the flaming.

 

Why does it matter if it's Helen Thomas? Is it supposed to be okay to say racist things about somebody if they criticize the President? When did you guys nickname her "Freak?" Is that another thing, only freaks criticize Bush?

BTW, the next time you see a middle eastern person, go up to them and say something like "hey Yuusuf, are you planing a Jihad, ha ha, I'm just kidding." Tell us how much they enjoy that joke.

 

I still dont see the big deal.....there werent any derrogatory remarks used