1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Airplane] What happens?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by WWR, Oct 25, 2007.

  1. CoolGuy

    CoolGuy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    102
    the simple flaw in the experiment was that the conveyor belt did not match the speed of the plane in the opposite direction. Conveyor belt was too slow, it did not match the planes acceleration!
     
  2. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,516
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    None of this matters because the engine powers the propeller and not the wheels. If it was a car then yes - the forward momentum is from the wheels being powered by the engine but this is a plane - the wheels don't matter, it will still move forward becuase the propeller cause the forward movement - it doesn't matter what the plan is siiting on. That's why planes can take off from water with pontoons as landing gear, they are not powered, just move with the plan when the engine goes.
     
  3. OldManBernie

    OldManBernie Old Fogey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2000
    Messages:
    2,851
    Likes Received:
    221
    Both the belt and the plane were going at 25 mph. The experiment goes to show that the plane continues to move forward regardless of the wheel and the conveyor belt. There is a major difference between a person running on a treadmill and a plane on a conveyor belt.

    A. Person on treadmill

    The forward force is generated from the back leg pushing forward. The forward force is negated by the treadmill going the opposite direction, so the rest of your body remains stationary.


    B. Plane on a conveyor belt

    The forward force is generated from the propeller engine. The forward force remains relatively unchanged because the conveyor belt does not impede the engine from generating the force. All the conveyor belt does is make the wheels spin twice as fast in order to match the plane's speed. The only thing that may affect the speed of the plane is the added friction due to the increased forward force.
     
  4. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,901
    Likes Received:
    39,881
    Unbelievable that people are still in here trying to say they might still be right.
     
  5. CoolGuy

    CoolGuy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    102
    so if the belt went 50mph, would the plane still move forward? Would the plane take off? They shoulda tested this....
     
  6. OldManBernie

    OldManBernie Old Fogey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2000
    Messages:
    2,851
    Likes Received:
    221
    I would imagine so. The wheels would be rotating to match 75 mph speed assuming the propeller is making it go 25 mph forward. I don't see why they have to test it when they've done the 25 mph test.
     
  7. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,901
    Likes Received:
    39,881
    Why? They already proved the scientific facts behind the propulsion of the plane. Do they need to test it for 30 mph? 50? 75? Would they have to test every conceivable speed before some would give up the argument?
     
  8. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    If the conveyor belt had gone 75 mph, or 100 mph, the plane would have still taken off with no problem.

    The only conveyor belt speed that would be relevant would be the limit on the speed the airplane's wheels could spin before failure, which I suspect is well over 200 mph.
     
  9. CoolGuy

    CoolGuy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    102
    ok, i finally understand what you all are saying.....
     
  10. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841
    This is hilarious...despite overwhelming evidence, some people are still reluctant to admit the truth, even going so far as to change the myth itself to fit into their argument.

    How difficult is this to understand?

    First off the myth is: A PLANE WILL NOT TAKE OFF ON A CONVEYOR BELT. It's as simple as that. Some of ya'll are complicating this so much.

    Now I will admit that the mythbusters may not always get it right...their baserunning (sliding vs. standing) myth was flat out wrong from the getgo. Others, like the sword cutting myth for example, I've questioned the validity of the results. But for this myth, the guys put a plane on a conveyor, the conveyor matched the speed of the plane, and the plane flew. They tested the myth exactly as stated and they busted it. I don't know how much more overwhelming the evidence can be cause I saw that plane take off clear as day. To reinforce their point, they even show an rc car on the treadmill, and it was completely stationary...if that doesn't clear it up then I don't know what will.

    And I for one enjoyed the heck out of the episode (or at least that segment). Doesn't matter that I was 95% sure beforehand what would happen...to see that plane take off the conveyor was pretty cool.
     
  11. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    FWIW, Jamie said that when he saw the plane going, he gunned his truck. They knew what was going to happen and although they didn't specify how much he got up to, I think Jamie and the tarp/treadmill did end up going faster than 25 MPH, faster than the top ground speed of the plane.

    In the first small scale test, they matched the speed of the plane to the speed of the treadmill (11.3 MPH) and it still moved forward. In the 2nd test, they had the cart pulling the treadmill going a little faster and the plane took off.

    They even had the "science content" section and explained exactly why a treadmill has no effect on how a plane moves forward complete and demonstrated it clearly with the RC car on the treadmill. If a car is on a treadmill, the treadmill acts directly on the thing that is moving the car forward (the wheels being powered by the engine) and can negate forward motion. But an airplane moves forward by its propellers pulling the plane through the air. The wheels aren't connected to the engine in any way. So the treadmill doesn't interact with what moves the plane forward. It can't negate forward motion if it doesn't even interact with the mechanism that moves the plane forward.

    If anybody watched that episode (with demonstrations and scientific explanations) and still doesn't get it, you're hopeless.
     
  12. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,428
    Likes Received:
    945
    For a thread that made it so many pages and had so many different posters, it's pretty weak that they are all gone now that the scenario has been played out.


    As was said earlier, it doesn't matter that they did not get over 25 mph. They proved in theory the plane would take off.
     
  13. WhoMikeJames

    WhoMikeJames Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    12,691
    Likes Received:
    306
    THANK YOU! This is what confuses everyone.
     
  14. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841
    Anyone checked out the forums on discovery's site? The Airplane episode thread has 130+ pages and going; 90% of the posts are by people who claim the guys didn't test the myth right and who cannot or will not grasp the concept that the plane and the wheels work independently of one another. It's pretty funny stuff....and I only looked at the first page!
     
  15. WhoMikeJames

    WhoMikeJames Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    12,691
    Likes Received:
    306
    They are going to have to redo it sadly.
     
  16. Miguel

    Miguel Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,625
    Likes Received:
    140
    I guess maybe WWR wasn't smart enough to remember how to log in and view this thread.





    Yeah, I went there.
     
  17. IROC it

    IROC it Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,629
    Likes Received:
    89
    And now....










    Did he Almu us?
     
  18. Franchise3

    Franchise3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    30
    For those who think the plane won't take-off, imagine this scenario:

    You have a grocery store conveyor belt moving at 10mph. You are holding a toy car (matchbox car with free spinning wheels) on the conveyor belt. You walk forward at 1mph. Does the car move on the conveyor belt?
     
  19. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    All any of this proves is that almost no one truly understands the question.

    But knowledge of the answer and knowledge of the question are mutually exclusive - they cancel each other out - if anyone were to actually possess knowledge of both the question and the answer it would cause the instant annihilation of the entire universe.

    The answer is '42', but it will take several hundred million years in order to properly calculate the question.
     
  20. rage

    rage Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    K-mart was a decent player at his best. He is pretty bad now and he is vastly overpaid. None of that bother me.

    What irritates me is this guy thumbing his chest every time he throws down a dunk after a great pass from Kidd or one of his other teammate. He acted as if he did something special. So comical.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now