As much as I like the guy, I'd toss in Mobley and even Griffin to get Chandler and Crawford. You may doubt the Bulls will. The rest of the planet KNOWS the Bulls wouldn't.
They're not. Those of us with sanity have two choices...either totally ignore it and let it slip off into oblivion or just post a one word answer without elaborating..."No". This thread starter is among the worst offenders...3 or 4 ridiculous Bulls trades this week.
sort your threads by user from the last 45 days and go to the sli- page...this guy is making more fantasy trades than Enron.
classic! Enron is always good for a joke. Just like slickyboy.. He has 19 posts, out of those 14 of them have been starting threads in GARM, out of those 14, 12 of them have been crappy trade ideas. out of those 14 threads, he has only responded to others input twice. See a pattern? what other kind of netizen starts threads that will illicit harsh responses and then sits back and watches the fur fly? say it with me folks....T. R. O. L. L. and we all know the best way to deal with trolls don't we? DONT RESPOND TO THEM then their threads wilt away and die.
You guys are way harsh. I'd never do this trade unless I'd completely given up on Francis, but it's reasonable. Taylor and Rose are both big contracts, but good players with limitations. Talent-wise, Francis v. Chandler and Crawford are comparable.
At least this tread gave me the chance to think about the possibilities of a Ming/Chandler frontcourt. WOW. Although Chandler lacks some bulk, he makes up for it with his style of play. However, his value is at its highest right now, it would take a miracle to pry him away from Chicago.
Someone please slap me across the back of the head with a sledge hammer. The trade ideas somehow get worse as we get better.
Crawford is a poor man's Steve Francis. Chandler is better than Mo but our team chemistry would be the worst in the league with this lineup.
