I think you might have been too close to that North Korean "nuke test" and rattled all your marbles --- you're in a real slump today Mr. Iroc it.
No. You are flat out, dead wrong, and continue to exhibit your ignorance for all to see. I'm going to let you keep POSTing this crap to see how many TIMES it takes you to figure out that you're wrong.
I understand that you think I meant the W Post.. But I meant what I meant. You are the ignorant one for overlooking my definition of "left-leaning." The Post is "leftist." Left-leaning would indicate left of dead center. I can find plenty to back that up. Sorry you don't see it that way, and cannot resist being a donkey about it. Stubborn to the END. btw- you didn't win. And "ignorance" is a total lack of knowledge about a subject.. that's why it is "bliss." You display "stupidity" which is a total denial of what you can clearly see or prove. If you call me ignorant, it makes you stupid, because you know I have the prior knowledge of what you say I don't. So there, Fisher.
Find one bit of semi-legitimate information which indicates that the Washington Times is anything other than a predominantly right wing publication. Not some random web post on freerepublic by some yahoo who thinks that newspapers in color send subversive messages, but something semi legitimate, which claims that a newspaper that is published by, written by, and read by conservatives, exclusively, is "left leaning". I'd like to know how you've come by this bizarre misconception and why you keep repeating this mistake. Let's get to the bottom of this mystery, Rocky, and see how much punsihment your chin can take.
WMD-believing RWNs: ===================================== IROC it: thank you so much for the hilarious comedy.
Man, I haven't laughed that hard in such a long time. It's like "pin the tail on the donkey". George Bush is blind, holding the pin, and poking wherever he feels like.
My God. The Rev Moon's Newspaper is about as "middle" or "left Leaning" as Moveon.org is "middle or Right leaning" Half assed attempts at cartoons wont hide the fact that this is about a poposterous statement. For everytime I hear someone spout that the Washington Times is Middle or left, Im going to spout that MoveOn.org is a newsworthy credible source thats right on tract.
Appearantly many here have not seen me admittedly say to "take me with a truck load of salt." I've been labeled a far far right wingnut neocon fanatic... so isn't anything but the Bible itself "left-leaning" to me? Well... Okay, I admit. The Times is much more right of middle than the Post, but does that make it a "right-wing" publication? Just because the website has links to GOP type sites? I don't think it's that clear cut. Are there not right-wing views expressed in the Post? I think there are... What made the GOP the "far-right?" There are tons of GOP approved issues that some of the "right-wingers" don't fully support... There are actually some Libertarian issues that most support, as well as some that all support that Dem's hold as "theirs." Like I said, compared to TBN, CBN, the 700 Club (folks I've been accused of listening to and being swayed by ), this is a left-leaning news source. When compared to traditional Christian circles, the "Rev. Moon" is a cult leader with skewed beliefs, that are far from Christianity... easily called "left-leaning" in that sense. And I am a terrible cartoonist. And I can be just as stubborn as Sam. We're both right. It's all in the point of view. I am a shill, anyway.... right? It's all in the context (meaning what I meant when I said it) and how you take it as literally, or are willing to see the meaning behind the words... BTW -Where has T_J been? I'm having to provide all the crap and take his heat?
Someone save this post. Please. I will, too, of course, but one never knows when one might be run over by a bus (driven by a Moonie, naturally) making a radical, left-hand turn.
Just for fun.... There are over 740 tons of Sarin alone unaccounted for... I'm a little irritated this morning - so let's do some math. How do you transport 740 tons of Sarin out of the country without being noticed? Remember, we can track individual trucks by satellite. So: Sarin vaporizes at room temperature, but it can be easily transported in drums in liquid form. A military truck could load perhaps 2 tons of barrels. 740 / 2 = 370 truck loads would have had to cross the Iraqi border in order for Saddam to have completely eliminated his Sarin stash before the war. How is it that we picked up individual "chemical weapon lab" trucks on satellite, but missed the 370 trucks moving across the border? If they were spaced only 150 feet apart, the convoy would have stretched for more than ten miles! How did we miss that? Or, maybe he really didn't have any "WMD". Think. Preferably on your own. It helps.
Your assumptions assume, also, that Saddam was an idiot. Is it not possible that there was no "convoy." They could have been "dripped" across the border much more inconspicuously.
It does not have to be a convoy... We can spot a single trucks. If you slide one truck over the border 370 times, you should still have a good probability of spotting something fishy going on.
Hey, it was you who proposed the convoy-- remember the thing you wrote about a 10-mile convoy? Needless to say it could also have happened in multiple places and across many months if not years. The heat was turned on him following the end of the Gulf War in 1991-92. Do those things pick up donkey carts?
They react that way... don't they? Okay. Well why get bent over it then? btw- "moonies" are not right-wing conservative Christians. If they ain't left yet, they will be. See? I'm a "wingnut."
