1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

$7.2 Billion F-22 upgrade

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Child_Plz, Nov 22, 2011.

  1. Child_Plz

    Child_Plz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    64
    TIMES article:
    http://battleland.blogs.time.com/2011/11/21/friday-evenings-furtive-f-22-fix/?xid=tweetbut


    http://gizmodo.com/5861838/74-billion-of-your-tax-dollars-are-upgrading-the-never+used-f+22

    Our defense spending is out of control, result of years of giving congress/pentagon a blank check. I understand the need to keep our country safe but they have to be smarter with the way they are allocating our tax dollars.
     
  2. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    We're building our military to fight the a war that ended around two decades ago.
     
  3. Big MAK

    Big MAK Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    4,305
    Likes Received:
    322
    and there's no room for defense spending cuts...
     
  4. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,878
    Likes Received:
    3,171
    Think about how much real and useful scientific research and development we could be funding with that cash. The entire budget of the National Science Foundation is only around 6 billion dollars. Hell NASA's budget is only around 17 billion dollars in a year.
     
  5. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    But, it's not like they just go burn a pile of cash. It cycles back through contractors into salaries, wages, technologies, and paid taxes.

    After the Germans raided Pearl Harbor, I don't think this country is ever going to get caught less than prohibitively armed.

    (do kids even watch Animal House anymore?)
     
  6. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,041
    this kind of stuff makes me so angry! this money should be going to public education and/or health care!
     
  7. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,878
    Likes Received:
    3,171
    Obviously but that doesn't make it efficient spending. All government spending works like that. But using that money to fund USEFUL research and development would be far more efficient. I'd rather have agencies like the NSF, NIH or NASA handing out grants to scientists with promising technology or directly funding R&D (in NASA's case). At least we'd be getting some useful technology in the process.

    We're wasting money on technology we won't use.
     
  8. Yung-T

    Yung-T Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    24,403
    Likes Received:
    7,050
    :confused::confused::confused:
     
  9. Qball

    Qball Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    Are you sure this money couldn't have been better used for education?
     
  10. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089


    Animal House - 1978

    John Blutarsky's inspirational speech to the boys of Delta House

    (a pretty common joke if you are really old)

    And I'm not defending the expenditure too hard, I'm just saying as shocking as the figure sounds it cycles back in to the economy pretty quickly and pretty completely, though it doesn't produce permanent infrastructure improvements or necessarily technology advancement (though that's not 100% predictable).
     
    #10 Dubious, Nov 22, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2011
  11. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    Love that movie, missed the reference.
     
  12. Hightop

    Hightop Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    69
    Or back to the people it was taken from.
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    If the Mongol Horde overruns your country, they take your money, rape your wife and kill you and your babies. So, you may want to pony up for national defense.

    Maybe you guys are a generation too far from WW2.
     
  14. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    I'm not advocating completely getting rid of the military, I just don't think we need such a massive military budget when our biggest threat seems to be from people who are having trouble making bombs without getting caught or lighting their underwear on fire.
     
  15. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,356
    Likes Received:
    13,245
    I think the point is that this isn't a defense project, even if it is labeled as such. Since what it's being spent on doesn't work, it can't help defend us.

    One alternative use not already mentioned that might appeal to you would be to spend the money on use-able defense.
     
  16. Commodore

    Commodore Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    31,409
    Likes Received:
    14,966
    Ignorant to argue that because a capability isn't needed in our current conflicts that it won't have use in other conflicts. There happens to be a large communist dictatorship developing an advanced fighter fleet as we speak.

    The question is not whether a weapon system is in use in any given conflict. The question is does the weapon system provide a capability that we might need in future conflicts. I can't speak to whether the F-22 is the best way to achieve air dominance/superiority (no one here is qualified to say), but to argue that it's a waste because we aren't using it is just stupid.

    The commenters have it right:

     
  17. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    A large Communist dictatorship whose economy would collapse if western consumers were banned from buying their goods and western CEOS shut down their sweatshops.
     
  18. BetterThanEver

    BetterThanEver Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931
    Likes Received:
    189
    The $7.2 bil funds aren't being used for defense. I rather watch that money spent on actual combat, such as $7.2 bil in upgrades for planest used in Afghanistan over a $7.2 billion upgrade for a glorified show plane that has not seen combat.
     
    #18 BetterThanEver, Nov 22, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2011
  19. Dubious

    Dubious Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    5,089
    Bruce Lee did all that training so no one would dare f**k with him and he didn't have to fight. Plus the white chicks dug it.

    Where does the money go? Does it disappear? Does it go into foreign hands? Sure the big wigs post the bonus money and put in their investment accounts, but for the most part, high tech defense expenses go right back into the American economy, greasing the wheels. It's not a big net loss even though it's huuuuge number. It comes out of the left pocket and goes in the right pocket.

    When 10 years down the road, Japan, Taiwan, Viet Nam and The Philipines come crying that China is dominating the South China Sea in a little shooting war and want you to honor your treaties and you don't have air superiority what are you going to do? ask nicely?
     
    #19 Dubious, Nov 22, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2011
  20. tinman

    tinman Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    98,884
    Likes Received:
    41,474
    I think the air defense is strong enough, we need more ground technology.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now