1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[610am] JVG names MoT starter at PF

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by codell, Nov 1, 2004.

  1. rhester

    rhester Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,600
    Likes Received:
    104
    Could it be for stability sake?

    We have Yao, JJ and MoTay from last season, they should all know the system.

    Now we are just incorporating TMac and CWard into the lineup.

    What is surprising is that this is not a good rebounding starting lineup.

    The best rebounder is probably TMac, unless Yao just goes crazy.

    I wonder what is up with Howard? JVG likes Spoon's rebounding off the bench.

    Could there be a deal? I would think so.

    But is it Mo Taylor or J Howard?

    I think we are about to make a trade for some outside shooting.
     
  2. DavidS

    DavidS Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2000
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure! I'll take him. He's a better rebounder and shoots almost as good.
     
  3. Mr Boo

    Mr Boo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    2
    good point!
     
  4. Nolen

    Nolen Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    2,718
    Likes Received:
    1,261
    Preseason statistics-

    Minutes per game:

    Howard 23 minutes
    Taylor 23.7 minutes


    Who cares? It doesn't matter. They're both going to see similar playing time depending on who matches up well and who kicks more butt that night.
    Wake up, guys. VG has stated multiple times to the press that they're both great and he'll go with whomever is rolling that night. Which is the same thing he said about our point guards:

    Lue 21.7 minutes per game
    Ward 22.5 minutes per game

    The preferred PF & PG won't necessarily be the ones starting the game. It will be the ones playing the 4th quarter. Just like Cassell and Kenny, remember?

    For now, Juwon will ironically be playing Mo's role as offense spark when Ming is off the floor. However, it's innaccurate to say that Mo really plays the low post- he starts with the ball from the wing, elbow, or high post. Juwon really plays in the low post, which will provide offensive continuity when Ming's not there.
     
  5. MONON

    MONON Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,903
    Likes Received:
    935
    I'd take him also, but I don't know what his contact situation is.
     
  6. fanwq

    fanwq Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly!
    Offence is the best weapon of defence sometimes.
     
  7. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,830
    Likes Received:
    3,176
    Juwann to be 4...and 3?

    Oh, and forget who starts -- who will finish?
     
  8. DavidS

    DavidS Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2000
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well said...he's a scoring PF, weak rebounder, not a bad passer, but not very willing when the opportunity presents itself.

    Howard, is a set shooter (10-18ft). Also has post-skills (back to the basket) and has a jumphook. Now, if he's not doing those things, he blocking out and trying to rebound. He's more active/tougher in the paint and more active on man-to-man defense (not a shot blocker, though). He's also a very good FT shooter (80%).

    MoT usually faces up and drives like a guard. Weak rebouder. Post moves seem non-existent. Not a willing passer. Overall a very good outside shooter (18ft). Decent FT% at 73%.

    Howard is just a better PF.
     
    #68 DavidS, Nov 1, 2004
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2004
  9. wardellp

    wardellp Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2002
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ben Wallace will not be able to roam freely in this first game like he would have against Cato. MoT or Howard are capeable of knocking down the open 10-15 footer.
     
  10. aznhowie20

    aznhowie20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    10
    so wat is the line up?

    Ward
    TMAC
    JJ
    Mot
    Yao

    ??
     
  11. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366
    count me in the it doesn't really matter crowd because both will end up with similar minutes. mo was great as a come off the bench instant offense guy last year but maybe jvg sees juwon with a similar ability. mo's the better shooter and with yao and t-mac this has to give you a little more spacing. i was surprised when cato became the starting 4 over mo last year but it turned out well and i don't think this is even as big of a deal.
     
  12. Tyler Durden

    Tyler Durden Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    0
    For those that said Cato starter last year because we needed defense and rebounding, i agree. And we still do. And since JHo is the better defender and rebounder, thats why i said it was a showcase move for Mo to start.

    However, it may be that Juwan is a better lowpost scorer, and in general a better player, so we bring him and Deke in to replace Ming and maintain continuity like someone said. I can buy that.

    Last year Mo was a better lowpost scorer than Cato, so he came in to replace Ming's scoring. This year Howard is a better lowpost scorer than Mo, so he comes in to replace Mings scoring. Ok.
     
  13. reptilexcq

    reptilexcq Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    0
    The one thing i been saying about Mo is he's just not fundamental. His game sucks period!! Yea he shoots great and has range...but that's about all he got. He lacks basketball IQ on the court and he force and ballhog everytime u give him the ball...that's the reason i don't like him. Even in those China games...he still show the same damm characteristics on the court. Just not a smart player man....!

    With that said, if JVG put him in the lineup...and if Mo don't change the way he play the game (that mean don't ballhogging and know when to pass when double team), i wouldn't be surprised if JVG go back to Howard quickly.
     
  14. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    Disagree with these two assessments. MoT has that baby hook and does take advantage of guys with his back when he has a mismatch, but usually his best option is facing up with his range and handles imo. And like some other poster said, he is a willing passer, just doesn't really have the capability to do it all that well, kinda like SF.

    I would say Mo and Ju's d is a wash, and their rebounding numbers probably aren't too far off either on a mpg basis. Mo is better or equal to Ju on just about every facet of the scoring one on one, and Ju is probably a slightly better passer.

    Also, Mo is a krispy creme eating pothead while Ju has herpes.
     
  15. DavidS

    DavidS Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2000
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I just don't see that baby hook very often. Most of the time he just faces up. So, ok, non-existent maybe too harsh. I just don't see him as post-player.

    About his passing. The black-hole stigma was for this reason. I was trying to think about what m_cable said about his passing ability...

    The way I see MoT passing is like this...As soon as he gets the ball in the post...he rarely passes it. Almost like Mobley. He just faces up, drives and shoots. So, his passing accuracy/ability I just don't see was the problem. He doesn't turn the ball over very much (1.99 per 27 MIN). And when he does pass it, it's usually for a re-post for the ball again, not for someone else to score. Willingness or ability? It's hard to tell. I just think he likes to score more than pass. Also, I don't see the passing mistakes from MoT like SF. That's why I said it was more about willingness. He just likes to shoot. Maybe he could pass better...if he tried. Especially off those drives he does.

    Howard seems to want to do both.
     
    #75 DavidS, Nov 1, 2004
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2004
  16. RocksMillenium

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    Messages:
    10,018
    Likes Received:
    508
    This sounds like one of those Kenny Smith/Sam Cassell deals. Kenny starts and Sam finishes.
     
  17. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    8,016
    Rebounding is going to be a nightmare unless Yao steps up to the plate in a big way. Mo Taylor is a decent powerforward but he doesn't compliment Yao in any way other than the fact he can shoot the middle range jumper.
     
  18. dharocks

    dharocks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    9,032
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    I think this was just done because Mo complements Yao better than Howard. Howards a good interior passer, but he's more fomfortable in the low post area whereas Taylor likes to operate at the elbows for dribble drives and jumpers.

    Howard will do most of the low post scoring when Yao needs a rest.

    J.Ho's really not that much better than Taylor on the boards. I don't think it makes a big difference who starts. Taylor will probably be the one playing in the 4th Q, his clutch shooting really seems to go unnoticed on this board.
     
  19. DavidS

    DavidS Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2000
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know it doesn't seem like much. But the slightly better rebounding from Howard does make a bigger difference than you might think. I do think he can get 8RPG this year with Yao and McGrady taking most of the shots. Here's a run down on Taylor/Howard rebounds...

    Taylor career rebounds: 5.0
    Howard career rebounds: 7.4

    Taylor's best rebound production was 6.50 w/35.9 MIN (1999-2000: for the Clippers)
    Howard's best rebound production was 8.4 w/36 MIN (1994-1995: for Bullets/Wizards)

    Taylor has played between 20-35 MIN per game (up and down depending on starter vs bench).
    Howard has recently played about 35 MIN per game (37 career).

    Last years REG-SEASON rebound stats for Howard/Taylor...

    Taylor: 5.1 w/27.7 MIN
    Howard: 7.0 w/35.5 MIN

    This years PRE-SEASON rebound stats for Howard/Taylor....

    Taylor: 3.2 w/23.7 MIN
    Howard: 6.2 w/23 MIN
     
    #79 DavidS, Nov 2, 2004
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2004
  20. rocket3forlife2

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    8
    how is juwon a better rebounder then mo?didn't taylor come of the bench and juwon started?I never have liked juwon, but he is a lil better then I thought he was from watching the preseason.
    juwon hasn't proved nothing on this team ,but mo has so how is it that people are surprised on this board?


    I was so anti mo 2 seasons ago the first half of the year when came back from his leg injury,but then mo started proving to me tht he could make a diffrence I think it was the cleveland game when he scored like 25 and kept us in the game.all iam saying is let's really see how juwon plays when it really matters for the rockets.
     

Share This Page