1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

3% Wealth tax: Yay or Nay?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Invisible Fan, Mar 1, 2021.

?

billionaire tax?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. I have no preference and I have no soul

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    14,490
    Likes Received:
    11,682
    Yes by all means as long as the funds are then used to create jobs since the trickle down never happened.

    Tax the rich = Fund a new WPA
     
    ArtV, DaDakota and jiggyfly like this.
  2. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,169
    Likes Received:
    48,342
    I would like to see more details of this proposal, plus I have no soul.

    What I'm wondering is wasn't the Alternative Minimum Tax supposed to address these things and could this be handled better by strengthening existing tax policy?
     
    No Worries likes this.
  3. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    11,899
    Likes Received:
    8,008
    yip. but Trump's tax cut for the billionaires eliminated AMT.

    so, just un-do the tax legislation that was passed under Trump's watch, which overwhelmingly favors the uber rich​
     
    Nook and rocketsjudoka like this.
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,169
    Likes Received:
    48,342
    I agree with this and like @rockbox ideally I would be for an extremely simplified and flat tax code. I think if we can get what the wealthy and corporations pay and taxes to actually match their marginal tax rates that would solve a lot of problems along with reducing the amount spent on CPA's and tax attorneys. The problem is though is that the tax code is one of the favorite things now to address policy issues including social policy. I caught myself the other day praising the EIC so admit I'm not immune to it.
     
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,169
    Likes Received:
    48,342
    My understanding is that while it greatly limited the AMT the AMT is still there. Could this reform just put back the AMT at pre-Trump levels or even pre-Bush levels?
     
  6. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    2% wealth tax isn't taking all their wealth dude. If anything it incentivizes the trust fund babies of the world who are children of real estate moguls to actually keep on investing so their wealth doesn't wilt down every year by 2%.
     
    #26 fchowd0311, Mar 2, 2021
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2021
  7. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,446
    Likes Received:
    47,358
    I don’t want to pay taxes so dumb politicians will cancel GTA 6 because they think it’s causing crime
     
  8. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,446
    Likes Received:
    47,358
    Man if they taxed smart people like the 99ers we would have Bernie Sanders banging at our door everyday
     
  9. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,287
    Likes Received:
    13,751
    And when regular people ask for LESSER loopholes, we start to hear mindless chants about SOCIALISM! Many of the people that would BENEFIT from this would rather hold down their neighbors than lift everyone up.
     
  10. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,287
    Likes Received:
    13,751
    How about they give the money to NO SEGMENT of the population and instead pool it into alleviating healthcare costs (would it even make a dent?)?
     
  11. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,891
    Likes Received:
    12,685
    I have no problem with guys like Bezos and Musk becoming filthy rich. I have big problems with guys like Trump, Paris Hilton, the Walton clan who didn't do **** to be rich. I also have big problems which a family owning a ranch the size of Rhode Island for 200 years, because some guy decided to fight Mexico over the right to own slaves.
    Putting more money into healthcare does not solve the underlying issue. The US puts more money into healthcare than any other country by a large margin. This is why I though Obamacare was a band-aid solution.

    The problem with healthcare in the US is that too many people not involved in delivering healthcare are making money from it. Too many administrators and middlemen. Too many different IT systems, too many insurance providers, too many IT systems, too many billing systems, too many people asking your if you have prior conditions because records are all over the place, too many lawyers suing, too much malpractice insurance, too many people suing, too many FDA regulations, too many everything. And none of this has anything to improve health and provide healthcare.
     
    Nook likes this.
  12. Xerobull

    Xerobull ...and I'm all out of bubblegum
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    37,039
    Likes Received:
    35,980
    So let them move. (Most won’t)
     
    ThatBoyNick likes this.
  13. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    31,403
    Likes Received:
    49,261
     
  14. ElPigto

    ElPigto Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    16,162
    Likes Received:
    25,963
    Sounds like M4A would be a great solution to reduce all this waste.

    Regarding the original post, I don't necessarily like the idea of using the ultra rich as a piggy bank, however, I'm tired of the growing wealth inequality in this country and continuing to allow these billionaires to continue getting more and more rich while the poor get more poor. So **** it, lets do it. We should all have an opportunity to achieve the American dream.
     
  15. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,891
    Likes Received:
    12,685
    I'm all for M4A as long as there are other options available. America is all about choice. It works for a large and most need part of the population so there is no reason why it can't work for the young and healthy.
     
  16. HTM

    HTM Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    7,994
    Likes Received:
    5,835
    I don't really care too much about a wealth tax either way but I predict it would bring in less revenue then projected by its proponents and cost more to enforce then projected by its proponents. Just a continuation of the massive expansion of the federal government and more expensive bureaucrats.
     
  17. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,519
    Likes Received:
    19,661
    No, because one day I'm going to sell enough essential oils that I too will be a Billionaire.

    You fat commie chumps need to reach for your bootstraps.
     
  18. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,086
    Likes Received:
    133,534
    Hey, take a tip from a fellow billionaire. I made my money selling boot leg VHS tapes many years ago, but if you want to make money now, start selling Scentsy ...... there is a LOT of money in that man. You can make $40 on a weekend,
     
  19. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,388
    Likes Received:
    39,960
    I want Eisenhower's plan - a corporate tax rate of like 52% and a wealth tax beyond say 300 or 400k........that escalates.

    DD
     
  20. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,938
    Likes Received:
    20,732
    My preference would be to address the issue directly.

    A 10% VAT would force companies with revenues to pay taxes on that.

    A flat tax like corporate and individual AMT would limit deductions to the flat tax amount, probably cancelling out many tax loop holes.
     

Share This Page