1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

2Pat in Today's Game

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by AFS, Dec 23, 2010.

  1. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,325
    Likes Received:
    3,586
    bingo
     
  2. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,560
    Likes Received:
    5,807
    C. Landry traded.
     
  3. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,849
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    What this means is that Luis is being marketed...
     
  4. lionaire

    lionaire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    6,026
    Likes Received:
    7,898
    Good logic. :grin:
     
  5. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,191
    Likes Received:
    3,407
    I see him as a backup PF next year, with our big man rotation being Scola/Hill/Patterson/Yao or Miller.

    For all those who say he's nothing more than a role player, it takes time for big men to develop. He has a good shot on offense and is obviously very smart. No reason why he can't develop Landry-esque offensive game, but enough size to be a good defender at the 4.

    He may not ever be a superstar, but Patterson seems to have a very reachable ceiling of 16/9 with good-to-great defense.
     
  6. anchel

    anchel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,915
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Patterson won't be traded. Maybe Hill.
     
  7. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,849
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    Nope (choke), it's Luis. :(
     
  8. Rockets4279

    Rockets4279 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,208
    Likes Received:
    14
    I think Scola will be traded. Morey clearly said they are thinking long-term and Scola don't fit that remark.
     
  9. khanhdum

    khanhdum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,397
    Likes Received:
    2,411
    well both chuck and hill were in foul trouble, so someone had to go battle with miller out there. I'm sure he was just out there because of that and none of the showcasing or coach deciding to give him random time.

    he did really great out there though, good job at moving his feet and getting into position on defense. his only jumpshot was fluid and he shot it confidently.
     
  10. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,910
    Likes Received:
    374
    Patrick got PT today because of foul trouble. Hill, Chuck and Miller all got two fouls early tonight.

    I'm glad he got some non-blowout time. He did decently when he was on the court... he's still got a ways to go but it was good to see him out there.
     
  11. LewLLOYD

    LewLLOYD Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    102
    Nice playing, 2Pat.

    Still haven't missed a shot.
     
  12. Redfan

    Redfan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    3
    My thoughts exactly. It is hard to remember sometimes how old scola is because he came in the league so late, but he is not a long term option. I heard morey in an interview the other day saying they sent 2Pat(love the nickname) down to the dleague because they wanted to make sure that he kept an aggressive mindset on offense rather than settling into a role player mentality. This seems to signal that they see him developing a primary option like scola is in the post.
     
  13. mike_lu

    mike_lu Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    169
    Brooks got no PT --> Brooks got PT --> Rafer Traded.


    Simple -> if you can actually play better than the guy you're playing behind, RA finds playing time for you ...
     
  14. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    I am all for giving some of Hill's minutes to Patrick in certain situations. He is the intangible Battier at the PF spot. It's not fluke he was a +10 while Hill was a minus 6. Patterson is solid and I always thought he would be the better of the 2. I also thought one of them would overtake Hayes eventually. But man after watching Hayes man up against Griffin. It's going to be a long time before that happens.
     
  15. BetterThanEver

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    9,931
    Likes Received:
    189
    Yao got no PT --> Yao got PT --> Yao got injured again. :grin:
     
  16. CheezeyBoy22

    CheezeyBoy22 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,140
    Likes Received:
    2,522
    No Hayesfan comments yet?
     
  17. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,910
    Likes Received:
    374
    Scroll up... I was post #30 :)
     
  18. CheezeyBoy22

    CheezeyBoy22 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,140
    Likes Received:
    2,522
    hehe

    awesome...
     
  19. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    and one..............YEAR.
     
  20. STUD

    STUD Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    4
    I hate that +/- crap, It doesn't tell you the fact that Hill was playing against Griffin, while Pat played against Diogu. Which is a big difference in competition..
    -------------

    And am I the only one that notice how bad he is at boxing out, he let Diogu get position inside almost every time. He, despite having a solid frame, still doesn't know how to use his body properly to seal out his man.

    I also have a problem with his athleticism, it seems as though he barely could get off the ground at times. He was not as explosive as advertise, and I know he measured with better athleticism than what his showed out there.(33 in vert and 11'8.5 maximum vert reach)

    On the bright side; he runs the court great, has very quick feet, and he also looks very fluid with his jump shot. I just think he needs to learn how to use his frame and length on defensive and offensive end(when it comes to defensive rebounding and posting up) a lot more.
     

Share This Page