Parsing the words, it does NOT say it's TEXANS scouts, which could indicate draft manipulation attempts by opponents.
Some would have Jackson or K Grant in that mix. I'm leaning more and more toward a true OT since there are more OTs and OGs who would play best inside and is deeoer. I'm fixated on Jack Nelson if we can't get an OT early. I like Wisconsin Linemen with attitude on the field. But he may not be there with 166 because other like him too. I hate the huge gap between 89 and 166. I have half a dozen players there that peak my interests. My favorite game play is to move down to 31 or 32 to pick up Ersery with a fifth year option. Give him time and tutelage under veterans before throwing him to the wolves while retaining an extra year of control. Compensation offers to move down tend to be based on players available rather than a trade value chart.
I noticed that he's a lefthander. Should make it much easier to play LG. Give me some farm boys playing on the OL.
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profo...ed-over-shooting-at-texas-car-lot-in-december When we didn't sign him, we..... dodged a bullet
Texans loving Booker is old recycled news. This has been said for the last couple of months. I an all likelihood the Texans pick will come down to between Zabel or Booker. Seattle has a huge need at Guard, picks at 18 and will probably pick one of the two with their selection.
Denver at 20 is expected to add an offensive weapon. I think that either Hampton or Loveland whoever is left will be the pick at 20. If Loveland is available at 25, I think the Texans would be having some interesting conversations.
Yep, I'll take my chances passing on Booker. Give me one of Conerly/Banks/Zabel/Jackson over Booker and I'm pretty sure one of the guys I like more will be there at 1-25.
Having watched every single collegiate snap Banks has taken, I can tell you this is complete and utter bs.
