1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. LIVE WATCH EVENT
    The NBA Draft is here! Come join Clutch in the ClutchFans Room Wednesday night at 6:30pm CT as we host the live online NBA Draft Watch Party. Who will the Rockets select at #3?

    NBA Draft - LIVE!

2015 Random Astros Trade Thread

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by The Beard, May 2, 2015.

  1. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,411
    Likes Received:
    159,028
    Rangers beat so TIFWIW

    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sources: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rangers?src=hash">#Rangers</a> very much in midst of talks with Philadelphia re: Hamels. ... But, so is Houston. <a href="http://t.co/ilBlJYHkZk">http://t.co/ilBlJYHkZk</a></p>&mdash; Evan Grant (@Evan_P_Grant) <a href="https://twitter.com/Evan_P_Grant/status/623580019734900736">July 21, 2015</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

     
  2. Fyreball

    Fyreball Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,962
    Likes Received:
    12,262
    At this point, I'm totally cool with forcing the Rangers to overpay for Hamels.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. RocketManJosh

    RocketManJosh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,875
    Likes Received:
    711
    Even if we do not make any major acquisitions, I am just ecstatic that we are even talking about the possibility. If we see meaningful baseball in the month of September, this team will have met my goal for the season.
     
  4. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Your Tweety Bird dance just cost us a run

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,084
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    It was--Zobrist wasn't much when we let him go
     
  5. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Your Tweety Bird dance just cost us a run

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,084
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    We don't need to trade for Lowrie when we already have him..
     
  6. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    87,940
    Likes Received:
    86,698
    Yeah, criticizing that is revisionist b.s. at its finest.
     
  7. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,411
    Likes Received:
    159,028
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Astros want a bat &quot;that would not add to the feast or famine type of offense that we've exhibited so far,&quot; Luhnow said.</p>&mdash; Jose de Jesus Ortiz (@OrtizKicks) <a href="https://twitter.com/OrtizKicks/status/623602830767591424">July 21, 2015</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  8. The Beard

    The Beard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,786
    Likes Received:
    6,159
    Yea, except I said Martin Prado, not Lowrie

    Look I like Lowrie and can't wait to get him back. He gives quality at bats even though his history says he obviously won't produce to the level he did early in the season before he got injured.

    As a platoon guy to face LHP, there really is no comparison between Lowrie and Prado

    Prado vs LHP
    2015, .297 with a .781 OPS
    2014, .366 with a .978 OPS
    2013, .291 with a .852 OPS
    2012, .323 with a .863 OPS

    Lowrie
    2015 only 19 at bats vs LHP before he got hurt
    2014, .228 with a .598 OPS
    2013, .305 with a .772 OPS
    2012, .184 with a .623 OPS

    Again, I like Lowrie and want him back. But to say they are the same guy vs LHP, it just isn't the case
     
  9. awc713

    awc713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    6,019
    Yonder Alonso might be the piece that makes the most sense from a cost and need stand-point.
     
  10. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Your Tweety Bird dance just cost us a run

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,084
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    That's fair. Looking at BABIP and noting that samples aren't huge vs LHP, it seems like Prado's expected output vs LHP is in the 2013 range (if he's still that guy post-injury). And yes, still better than Lowrie. But is it worth dealing for Prado and figuring out what to do with Lowrie? (Trade? Cut? Non-playing bench?)

    Personally, I'd rather swallow that difference, go with Lowrie, and use whatever prospects you'd consider in a Prado deal to go after a bigger OF/1B bat and/or SP, or even a RP before making a Lowrie-->Prado mild upgrade.
     
  11. RockFanFirst

    RockFanFirst Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,067
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    I agree. Acquire a bat that "feasts" only, please.
     
  12. The Beard

    The Beard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,786
    Likes Received:
    6,159
    Yea I certainly wouldn't give up a major prospect for Prado, but with our depth and the fact that we will lose some guys to rule V and so forth if we don't do something, i'd certainly see what it would take to get him. There is also the fact that we all think that Lowrie would be fine defensively at 3B, but we know Prado will be Lowrie has never really done it

    I also think there could easily be a place for both of them on the team. We still don't have the answer at 1B and Lowrie could play into that also. As for using the prospects we would give up for Prado in a bigger deal, I agree I would rather have a top 1B, but there really doesn't seem to be any of those available. And if it took a prospect in a deal for Prado that would be needed in a deal for an Ace or major bat, then i'd agree to pass.

    I just think he is a guy who would fit in really well, Miami seems to be thinking about selling, and it would be worth checking in to see if one or two of our "depth" type of prospects would get it done. That's all i'm sayin
     
  13. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Your Tweety Bird dance just cost us a run

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,084
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    Lowrie has played 50+ games at 3B. Not a ton, but he's done it and has been fine. Luhnow has planned to play him at 3B since before the season and has acknowledged it now. I think we should all safely assumed he can do it, and do just fine at it.

    As for getting Prado and then shifting Lowrie to 1B...that means we're filling the Carter (or Singleton) hole, assuming one of them is gone, with Lowrie? As you already exhibited, Lowrie's OPS isn't spectacular. While I'm ok using him as a stopgap at 1B, I don't think it's smart to make a trade for additional "offense" just to plop Lowrie at 1B. If you're going out and getting offense because Lowrie's isn't good enough, then you can't use him at a "more offensive" position like 1B and say we're good.

    Totally understand what you're saying and why you bring it up. I just don't think it makes sense for this team as it's currently constructed given the holes and given where we have depth (i.e. Lowrie). Without him, or if Valbuena were to go down even, I'd be all for it. Or, I suppose, if all options at 1B who are better than Prado are unavailable or too expensive...then yes, go for it.
     
  14. The Beard

    The Beard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,786
    Likes Received:
    6,159
    Yea i'm just saying that if Prado could be had for one or two of the type of prospects we would risk losing in rule V (and Miami likely wouldn't have to risk them), then it would be good.

    If it took the type of prospects that we would have to move in bigger deals, then i'd be completely opposed to that myself.

    I like Marwin ok, but if it was an easy deal to make and only cost us guys we risk losing anyway, and it meant Prado platooned at 3B and Lowrie got Marwins role, then it would be worth it. Improve wherever you can.
     
  15. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,411
    Likes Received:
    159,028
    Heyman:

     
  16. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    87,940
    Likes Received:
    86,698
    For the millionth ****ing time in the last 2 months, Heyman, you hack:

    Hamels DOES NOT have a "no-trade list".
     
  17. The Beard

    The Beard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,786
    Likes Received:
    6,159
    It's hard to know what is truth and what is not when it comes to "quotes" from people

    But if he really, seriously doesn't want to be here, then I don't want him here

    I've been one that has said Hamels before any other because he is signed and wouldn't be a rental

    But if he doesn't want to be here and would only come here as a last resort, i'd rather go after Price hard
     
  18. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    108,411
    Likes Received:
    159,028
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Luhnow on looking for offense: &quot;The high strikeout, high home run is probably not the ideal fit for our lineup.&quot;</p>&mdash; Brian McTaggart ⚾️ (@brianmctaggart) <a href="https://twitter.com/brianmctaggart/status/623626349782044672">July 21, 2015</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  19. cardpire

    cardpire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    769
    i'd rather have price + increased chance of signing price over hamels regardless.
     
  20. The Beard

    The Beard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,786
    Likes Received:
    6,159
    I would agree, if there was any evidence that trading for them gives you an increased chance of signing them. I have no numbers to back this up, but it certainly seems like a very high percentage of trade deadline rentals go elsewhere?
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now