<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FUYjD7A75HQ&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FUYjD7A75HQ&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> Word on the street dude don't like to practice.
He'll never come off the bench, he stated tha recently.. dudes ego is ridiculous, shame cuz he could be an asset
When I read the title of this thread, I KNEW the thread starter HAD to have less then 100 post. Just wanna let y'all know I called it.
Post this is in the 2010 offseason thread so it can get lost in the shuffle and go unnoticed along with all the other HORRIBLE suggestions.
If Bosh doesn't work out I am hoping Morey just waits until the deadline. Maybe the Hornets or Nuggets will be struggling and looking to move CP3 or Carmelo. We still have the best package of assets to offer in a trade and we won't have to deal with the drama of enticing the player to want come to Houston.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/31g0YE61PLQ&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/31g0YE61PLQ&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Got lost from the Boozer shenanigans...In case someone wants to comment... Rockets send: Aaron Brooks Trevor Ariza TE from Carl Landry trade 2011 Rights to Knicks Draft Pick for Pacers send: Danny Granger I know it seem pretty simple. I but It makes some sense. Rockets have to give up a lot, but Granger can be a wing finisher. He should probably drive more than he does right now, but he would easily replace the scoring that Brooks would. You have to give up Ariza to give them a reasonable SF. This would leave us with Battier as a wing defender, but Granger is not a slouch defensively. He has the length and athleticism to do so. Not to mention with Lowry now taking the starting PG spot, have Martin at SG is not as much a liability. Trade exception helps to make the money work out. Pacers need a starting PG badly. They have tried to find one for a long time, and have not found one. Interestingly enough. We seem to have 2 (depending on which poster you talk to). AB gives them a star PG to build around a fills a whole they have had for years. The Trade exception helps them get under the lux tax margin for this year, which saves them some money. Ariza is a starting worthy SF to good 6th man. He works well for them if they were to play Paul George at the SG and Dunleavy at PF. Lastly, even with the Knicks getting Amare, that pick will be a very good pick, likely Top 10, giving Pacers another young player to develop. Then in the post they already have Hibbert & Hansborough in the Post. You could dangle Hill if you Pacers won't find a better PG on the FA market, and even the ones there will make a good amount of money given how many teams are either under the cap or trying to become a contender. They do have a lot of players expiring this year and you at first would think they could use those to get a PG on their team, but their honestly are not that many options. The only real options I can think of would be Jose Calderon on the Raptors, Mo Williams on the Cavaliers, Baron Davis on the Clippers, and Gilbert Arenas on the Wizards. All have fairly bad contracts and are starting quality. However, the Raptors, Cavs, and Clippers have no one to replace them at this time even if they want to get rid of them. The Clippers are probably trying to see if they can make the playoffs with this team. So, I know that was super long, but that was my reasoning. Let me know what you think.
I want that fool about as much as I want Karl Malone and John Stockton to come out of retirement and play for the Rockets. I'll let you figure out what that means.
<br> People are kind of dense. Boozer would be a good fit on this team because he can hit the outside jumper and is a constant offensive threat. The problem is, he can't rebound worth anything (neither can Bosh...) and his dedication is questionable at best. If Boozer were determined and played hard I would take him in a heartbeat. Honestly people need to get over the whole "OMG BECKY, HE PLAYS ON THE JAZZ" mentality and look for the best move available. However at this point, Boozer isn't it.
