Hawks played well.. just as I thought though for the Bucks, not enough offense for them to compete against the Hawks. They have too many weapons and a balanced offense.
It's really a shame that Bogut is injured. The Bucks just can't stop Josh Smith and Al Horford inside. Bogut at least could have slowed them. Even though this game is close so far the Bucks have no chance in this series.
I think that's how most everybody sees it. If I'm the Hawks, I may even hand the Bucks a game and take it in 5 to avoid getting rusty for the start of the second round. No, not seriously but if the Hawks lose more than a game to the Bogut-less Bucks, I would consider that to be a sign of an unfocused team and would be concerned as a fan.
Yes, sir. Without Bogut the Hawks are just superior talent-wise and really should sweep them. That Ilyasova kid looks pretty damn quick and mobile for his size, BTW.
Jennings is 1-10 and has been stuffed 4 times. He has the same body type as Brooks and suffers in the same way to finish in traffic and through contact. Both he and Brooks need to get stronger and watch lots of Tony Parker tape to learn how to finish in the land of the trees. Parker would be a below average PG in this league without that skill.
P.S. I'm mad at you. I figured you would have started some sort of playoff hockey thread in the Hangout by now. What gives? Slacker
Didn't watch the game, but I'm going to assume the Hawks were up, and then the Bucks came back? I would be quiet too.
