Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
This is really a non-issue, You just treat it as the net effect. If you take a 2-pt FT, you just treat it as though the player went 2-2 or 0-2 on...
The only options aren't "be awesome" or "reset". The Rangers won the WS a few years ago as the 6 seed (facing another 6 seed that also made the...
Why would any team trade for a guy they can't play without risking running him into the ground?
Those people could flop now and get 3 free throws and shoot 80% on them too. 1 FT worth 3 pts nets the the same number of points a 3 FTs worth 1...
Yes, let's keep moving the crappier hitter farther up the order so they get more at-bats because "let's try things because I don't understand...
Would it be better if he was a "man" like Jimmy Butler or Harden or any number of other stars and repeatedly pouted and demanded trades to...
Cleveland and LA weren't even close to being playoff teams when he joined them.
Nick Allen has been waaay better in the 9 spot than 8th the last two years - over 300 OPS better this year. Why don't you care about that? You...
If Joe had just never played Pena, he wouldn't be hurt right now. The Astros should think about that every time they start any of their players.
Maybe. That doesn't change the fact that isn't not "just over .500 for June".
This seems to be the common theme. As though you'll go find new Altuves and Yordans in trades and everything will be great again in a few years.
They played at a 100 win pace in June.
Are they really being fiscally sane? They are getting paid the same amount the next two years, so Boston just has a much crappier player/team for...
Yes, one politician that people are spellbound by told him that he should care about it, and now it's suddenly a big deal to him. Similar to...
Same as it's been for 150 years. Something tells me you never cared or complained about this prior to 1-2 years ago.
Except certain things ARE dumb. If you flip a coin 4 times and it comes up heads, and you decide "hey, let's make a strategic decision based on...
Yes, it is. Its 60 at bats or so in the 9 spot and less than 100 in the 8 spot. That's 2 weeks / 1 month worth of play. It's completely and...
Because randomness is a dumb reason to do anything. In small sample sizes, Jake Meyers hasn't shown anything. If one random flyball in the 9 spot...
Wait, you really believe this? And based on sample sizes of like 50-80 at bats? Do you do the same with monthly samples? When Yordan is 300+ OPS...
Where do you want him to bat Meyers and what impact do you think that will have on the offense?