Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
actually, 3 rockets scored double-digit points, rafer and bonzi each had 17 while yao had 19.
How could the refs call this foul on Yao? <div align="center"> <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash"...
rafer is going to out score yao AND Howard tonight .. :cool:
rafer > t-mac :p
results of a make-over competition: [img] cat [img] captain obvious [img] solution to a mathematical question [img] makes no...
Howards is going to snap Yao like a twig, and T-Mac is going to misses 60% of his jumpers. Rox lose 88-105. Prove me wrong.
0.5 here we come.
apparently the nets haven't beaten the rox at Jersey for 4 and a half years ... ever since yao joined the rox. :)
alston is bloody moron.
tmac is in god mode
alston owns the nets
tmac is god like.
sop://broker1.sopcast.com:3912/6002
if you are gonna count the pure potential of $6 into account, maybe you should also include the interest rate and inflation in your calculation....
Yes, but it would cost him another $15 to get another pair of the shoes and he could still sell it for $21, hell he could even sell it for $50 to...
His labour and store space is part of the cost. The $6 is pure profit and should not count towards the cost. If the owner had expected 1 million...
No, one more time is good enough for me. i was wrong to forget about the $21 that the owner kept. You are wrong to include the $6 in the cost...
gosh, you are right, i feel dumb. it is $44. :( there goes the all-chinese-are-good-at-math stereotype.
i don't think he has the $21 change after the scam. the crook got the change.
why did he get the change? did he give the change to the scam artist?
