Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
When the investigation is begun as a result of evidence of high level Trump campaign workers meeting with Russian officials, why exactly should...
It appears that what he is saying is that false suspicious person reports involving black people might be indicative that the person doing the...
Again, because there has only been evidence of Trump's campaign being involved with Russian officials.
Because Trump's was the only campaign with high level contacts with Russians. Because there was only evidence pointing at one campaign.
Yes, all those conservative snowflakes who just can't handle that they elected a complete dumba$$ suck, badly.
And, like everything else in this administration, it is nothing but a cheap knock-off.
Yes, but she's a moderately attractive conservative, so all the Fox "News" sycophants will just swallow all the turds she tosses to them because...
Gowdy lying in order to bash Democrats wouldn't be in any way out of character for him.
There aren't any "talks" of Trump getting a Nobel, there are merely conservatives asking "shouldn't Trump get a Nobel" when most reasonable people...
And you're incapable of discussing the facts, so you use the genetic fallacy instead. You realize that the statistic you cite doesn't prove the...
No, it was Bill Clinton's haters who did that.
I wonder how you missed the relevant part of the article... "along with other evidence" Keep trying, eventually some of your bullsh!t might...
No, I was spending time with my family. Feel free to post links to the opinions in the cases for which you provided titles.
Well, except that I answered it. All you do by ignoring my answer is further prove your ignorance.
Not "my girl," I didn't vote for her and I even provided proof when you tried to call me a liar. Because of the way that courts have applied and...
More insults, no substance, no substantiation of claims, as is the usual. Hint: You're not the one acting like an "adult" in this conversation.
You said "voted for," not "reported they voted for." Votes are a matter of public record.
They didn't. It was 93% in 2012 and 95% in 2008. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2008/...
Why hasn't anyone ever been prosecuted by DoJ when there wasn't intent to distribute classified material? Why has the only place where "gross...
If it is "old news," you can provide some evidence. Awww, more insults, how adorably inane. Except that intent matters. You're welcome to...