Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
You need to be more clear on what you mean by "both sides of the argument". To which argument, specifically, are you referring? We do know for...
Thanks, Mathloom. Saw your post, but I wanted to take some time to respond thoroughly. I'll post my thoughts tomorrow.
I guess the government officials responsible for the greatest act of terrorism on American soil were uncomfortable about lying about it on the...
It was pathetic, like most of his calls.
This isn't evidence. It's wild speculation.
Beautiful.
Yonkers, whether you realize it or not, you're acting as a surrogate to the OddsOns in this thread by extending their naturalist critique of...
I'm saying that question shifts the burden of proof. Homosexuals don't have to prove that their lifestyle is acceptable. I think you're...
The fallacy is you are shifting the burden of proof. People make the argument that homosexuality is wrong because it is unnatural. Response: it...
That wasn't directed at you. Well... it's not an exact comparison. Homosexuals can generally reproduce if they want to. But my point was that...
But this is an erroneous view of evolution. An individual being unable to reproduce is not a failure for the species. There are specific fitness...
There is no doubt that homosexuality has a genetic component. Various twin studies have pretty much settled the issue.
Actually, yes. It makes perfect sense if you think about it from an evolutionary perspective. Of course, you will likely not think about it,...
It's perfectly natural and carries an evolutionary advantage. Otherwise it wouldn't exist.
I don't think it's pointless. At the very least, it forces people to put down their ideas in an organized way.
By all accounts? I doubt that. That's a pretty awful argument. Never mind! :D
I'm not sure what your point is. I was replying to a specific claim another poster made. You would be wise to observe context before claiming...
The verse supposedly describing the origin of the universe: (source: http://www.islamicity.com/QuranSearch/) The first part is far too...
I don't think I look foolish. Does the original Quranic manuscript exist or not? What is the earliest extant copy?
