Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Yes, it means there are many women who face extremely complex ethical choices. Your attempt to paint this as a black and white issue betrays a...
The standard of the law never had anything to do with salvation. You are still supposed to follow the law, according to Jesus.
None of this seems to matter to certain Christians lacking in compassion.
None of that says anything about what God considers the beginning of life. How can having blood be the standard for life when most organisms...
Then why did Jesus say, "Heaven and earth will disappear before the smallest letter disappears from the Law"?
Matthew 4:17-19 seem to suggest that the OT law still applies:
How very Christian of you.
Why is Genesis applicable to abortion and not dietary law?
And why is that? How are these mutually exclusive? I would say they are margainally better than Iran, which has an unelected body with veto...
Could you please provide the textual support for this claim?
You quoted someone who cited Genesis 9:4 as the basis for Christians to believe that having blood is the standard for life. Presumably this means...
Sorry for the double-post, but I am curious as to whether you exclusively eat Kosher meat?
Actually the verse (Genesis 9:4) deals with eating meat that still has blood in it. It has nothing to do with human blood at all, unless you take...
How can having blood be the standard for life when most life doesn't have blood?
I read a lot. Would you mind helping me by directing me to your source for the claim that Holder is funneling money to ACORN?
How arrogant to presume to know God's mind. Also, the vast majority of life has no blood.
I'm confused. You say the Israelis are only doing what they have to do to survive, yet you equate their tactics to voter intimidation?
Your SS reference is ironic considering the subject of the article in the OP.
That's correct. I'm not sure where all the smug incredulity of certain posters in this thread is coming from.
I don't agree with it, but her decision seems consistent with the way the SCOTUS has dealt with these types of cases.
