Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
I came to this conclusion studying environmental science in grad school.
This is entertaining. Pwned hard and still going...
I understand your POV. It's complicated.
The same problem still exists, even as you try to "de-vague" the terms. It's a nebulous accusation with no burden of proof that results in...
Seeing the thread title my first reaction was: [IMG] Hat tip to MoBalls for the pic
Nice ad hominem. Of course I don't. But I'm rarely as dramatically inconsistent as the example above.
bwahaha amazon pulled the download due to the complaints.
To this point, anyone recall when Rand wanted to criminalize attending naughty speeches? This is especially ironic, given that "speech" was a...
"Actively engaged in terrorist activities" (your words) is so vague it's meaningless. It certainly encompasses a lot more than a "shootout".
I cannot express my level of "what the hell are you talking about" adequately.
Disagree. Prove it first. Innocent until proven guilty.
Rand is a unique character. The others are probably only interested in the limelight. Not to make Rand out as a messiah, just that he has some...
That would be awesome.
Four of the senators who joined Rand Paul voted against a ban on indefinite detention of US citizens. Politics as usual.
I have not had a soft drink or juice or gatorade in years. I stick to water and booze. For health reasons.
I'm not happy with that response because this is coming from the same administration that still denies the drone program even exists.
lol. And there you go. That was a confusing post.
:confused: I presume you are insinuating that drone strikes on American citizens is "effective". Effective at what? And how?
I am opposed to drone strikes.
No surprise.