Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Here's another laugher: http://www.enstarz.com/articles/8776/20121101/latest-presidential-polls-obama-lead-romney-electoral-votes.htm
rep'd
Endeared to the Beard!
Do you realize we are paying him less than what Chicago is paying Taj? That's crazy.
Do you realize we are paying Omer less than what Chicago is paying Taj?
Here's what my predictions were and are: 1. Nate would wind down his predictor to close to 50/50 or Romney over 50% by election day or...
......as with every election.
He is improving. But I'm still not sold on him as a rotation difference maker over a bit bench player.
What a stud. We need one more stud to play with these guys and we're on our way.
That is one flimsy predictor right there. And it's gonna bite Nate in the butt. Watch.
LOL. D-e-n-i-a-l.
Drop the hammer big boy. http://jessemerkel.policymic.com/
Dude, he sent Clinton to MINNESOTA. Not Michigan, not Wisconsin. MINNESOTA!!!
Yeppers! In a perpendicular universe somewhere beyond the matrix....
Yeah, just terrible. ;)
How much should we have spent the last 4 years, Sam, and what should we have spent it on?
Four years later, Obama's excuse for this poor economy is Bush's war spending and tax cuts. It begets the question I asked. What would Bush have...
Don't agree on the 1in/4out. Howard can't shoot the freebies that he's gonna get by posting up in the spread. Makes them much more inefficient....
I'm gonna watch the yes tally outweigh the no tally 3 to 1 without more than just a few offering an explanation of how Bush would have spent more...
And my point is they have already aligned. This is the worst economy since the great depression and the sitting president has presided over it....
